[cfp-interest 3393] Re: DTS ballot comments

[Damian McGuckin]

On Sun, 16 Feb 2025, Jim Thomas wrote:

> For the DTS 18661-4 ballot, there were two comments (GB-001 and GB-002), 
> both from United Kingdom. Both identify clearly editorial errors and the 
> proposed changes are straightforward and simple. I recommend that CFP 
> agree with the comments and the proposed changes.

Sounds good to me Jim.

> For the DTS 18661-5 ballot, the only comment was from United Kingdom 
> (GB). The error identified in the comment appeared in the earliest 
> drafts (from 2022-11-01) for the revision of the first edition which did 
> not have the error. I could find no documentation or reason for the 
> error. I recommend that CFP agree with the comment and the proposed 
> change.

Ditto.

Thanks - Damian