[Cfp-interest 2987] Re: WG14 meeting day 1

[Rajan Bhakta]

Yes that is the full and correct change.

Regards,

Rajan Bhakta
z/OS XL C/C++ Compiler Technical Architect
ISO C Standards Representative (Canada, USA), INCITS/C Chair
C/C++ Compiler Development
rbhakta at us.ibm.com<mailto:rbhakta at us.ibm.com>

IBM


From: Jim Thomas <jaswthomas at sbcglobal.net>
Date: Monday, January 22, 2024 at 12:10 PM
To: Rajan Bhakta <rbhakta at us.ibm.com>
Cc: cfp-interest at oakapple.net <cfp-interest at oakapple.net>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Cfp-interest 2985] WG14 meeting day 1
On Jan 22, 2024, at 9: 25 AM, Rajan Bhakta <rbhakta@ us. ibm. com> wrote: Summary of day 1: Both our suggested ballot resolution comments (033, 046) were accepted as presented. For comment 069, part of the proposed change (the other parts
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
<https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/PjiDSg!2W-vYl7fS5l6NGYbmK8Fjal6zT5iuuJGaDNylyMrNx586wshk7WhIIrISEMXR_O3JjjtJlmF_RlRHX8sdmkTc3AIJEALuPsKfNy-$>
Report Suspicious <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/PjiDSg!2W-vYl7fS5l6NGYbmK8Fjal6zT5iuuJGaDNylyMrNx586wshk7WhIIrISEMXR_O3JjjtJlmF_RlRHX8sdmkTc3AIJEALuPsKfNy-$>


ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd



On Jan 22, 2024, at 9:25 AM, Rajan Bhakta <rbhakta at us.ibm.com> wrote:

Summary of day 1:

Both our suggested ballot resolution comments (033, 046) were accepted as presented.
For comment 069, part of the proposed change (the other parts seem good to me so I am not posting them here) to section 6.4.4.2 Note 1 is:
Conversions yielding exact results require no rounding -> Conversions yielding exact results are not affected by the order of negating and rounding.

I assume the proposed change is:

Conversions yielding exact results require no rounding, so are not affected by the order of negating and rounding. -> Conversions yielding exact results are not affected by the order of negating and rounding.

Right? It looks fine.

Thanks for the report!

- Jim Thomas


The wording change seems fine to me, but I did want to pass it along to CFP in case others find issues with the change. For reference, the comment stated “you cannot have requirements/require” in notes and is from ISO.

Regards,

Rajan Bhakta
z/OS XL C/C++ Compiler Technical Architect
ISO C Standards Representative (Canada, USA), INCITS/C Chair
C/C++ Compiler Development
rbhakta at us.ibm.com<mailto:rbhakta at us.ibm.com>

IBM

_______________________________________________
Cfp-interest mailing list
Cfp-interest at oakapple.net<mailto:Cfp-interest at oakapple.net>
http://mailman.oakapple.net/mailman/listinfo/cfp-interest<http://mailman.oakapple.net/mailman/listinfo/cfp-interest>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20240122/4f182a4c/attachment.htm>