[Cfp-interest 2986] Re: WG14 meeting day 1

[Jim Thomas]

> On Jan 22, 2024, at 9:25 AM, Rajan Bhakta <rbhakta at us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> Summary of day 1:
>  
> Both our suggested ballot resolution comments (033, 046) were accepted as presented.
> For comment 069, part of the proposed change (the other parts seem good to me so I am not posting them here) to section 6.4.4.2 Note 1 is:
> Conversions yielding exact results require no rounding -> Conversions yielding exact results are not affected by the order of negating and rounding.

I assume the proposed change is:

		Conversions yielding exact results require no rounding, so are not affected by the order of negating and rounding. -> Conversions yielding exact results are not affected by the order of negating and rounding.

Right? It looks fine.

Thanks for the report!

- Jim Thomas
 
> The wording change seems fine to me, but I did want to pass it along to CFP in case others find issues with the change. For reference, the comment stated “you cannot have requirements/require” in notes and is from ISO.
>  
> Regards,
> 
> Rajan Bhakta
> z/OS XL C/C++ Compiler Technical Architect
> ISO C Standards Representative (Canada, USA), INCITS/C Chair
> C/C++ Compiler Development
> rbhakta at us.ibm.com <mailto:rbhakta at us.ibm.com>
>  
> IBM
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Cfp-interest mailing list
> Cfp-interest at oakapple.net <mailto:Cfp-interest at oakapple.net>
> http://mailman.oakapple.net/mailman/listinfo/cfp-interest

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20240122/0e5b80b4/attachment-0001.htm>