[Cfp-interest 2960] Re: reserved prefix for augmented arithmetic functions

[Damian McGuckin]

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023, Jim Thomas wrote:

> Following up on an action item 
>
>           Jim: Part 4: Add a subclause to 5 (perhaps 5.4) for
>       reserving prefixes, possibly referring to C 7.33.
> 
> I?m thinking aug is too generic a function prefix to be reserved. Would 
> you object to changing to aug_? Then the functions would be aug_add, 
> aug_sub and aug_mul. The underscore would be consistent with the style 
> for the reduction function names, e.g. reduc_sum, in TS-4.

Sounds goods to me.

Thanks - Damian

Pacific Engineering Systems International ..... 20D Grose St, Glebe NSW 2037
Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here
Views & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present employer