[Cfp-interest 2655] Re: 2023/01 WG14 interim meeting results

Jim Thomas jaswthomas at sbcglobal.net
Mon Jan 30 12:26:31 PST 2023


Here is an update that includes changes to address the issues Joseph pointed out in the previous version:

https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/WG14_issues_with_response_to_NB_comments-20230130.pdf

- Jim Thomas

>> On Jan 30, 2023, at 9:04 AM, Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> 
...
>> GB-173 was accepted, the wording for the new functions should follow the 
>> changes made there rather than just having an "if accepted" note.  Also, 
>> where this has strtoencdecdN and strtoencbindN in a Synopsis, those should 
>> be wcstoencdecdN and wcstoencbindN as in the heading.



> On Jan 29, 2023, at 4:22 PM, Jim Thomas <jaswthomas at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> 
> This note suggests changes requested by WG 14 for response to NB comments GB-286 and GB-287. This note is a draft, for review and discussion at the 2023-01-31 CFP meeting.
> 
> https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/WG14_issues_with_response_to_NB_comments-20230129.pdf
> 
> - Jim Thomas
> 
>> On Jan 26, 2023, at 1:50 PM, Rajan Bhakta <rbhakta at us.ibm.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Details:
> 
>> ...
> 
>> GB-286: WG14 wants us to give the specification for wcstofN and wcstodN functions. If we can do that before the February meeting, we can address the comment then. If not, WG14 will ask us to do so for CD 2.
>> GB-287: Discussion today seemed to have some people NOT want to make it implementation defined (though there were at least two people who were confused as to what we was being proposed so this may change tomorrow and end up being accepted). The votes went in favor of implementation defined as we suggested, but it was not a strong enough majority. One request made was to not have hex input at all (Jens), another single suggestion was to only have hex input allowed in the base standard if the implementation also conforms to Annex H. Another opinion seemed to want it to be mandatory for all implementations.
>> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20230130/4f51413c/attachment.htm>


More information about the Cfp-interest mailing list