[Cfp-interest 2576] Re: CFP review of NB comments on CD

[Mike Cowlishaw]

I've looked at the various formatting comments, and agree with them all.
Specifically, referring to NB_comments_on_CD-JWT-20230102.pdf:


p12 US6-023
 
  Agree.  This already applies to the pre/postfix operators and the
  '-(x), +(x)' operations, which are already in that font.
 
  I had originally assumed that the other plus and minus signs were
  intended as explanatory notes and were not code; however these are
  probably intended to mean the operators found inline in code and so
  they should indeed be in the program font.
 
  Note that they are that way in N3XXX.pdf .. so perhaps this comment
  is there to allow that change?   I'm not sure which document the
  comments are referring to.

p20 GB-063
 
  Agree.  I have checked the listed cases(6.5.2.1, 6.5.3.3, 6.5.6,
  7.17.7.5).

p68 GB-261
 
  Agree.  For example in F.10.1.1 acos(1) returns +0, the + is in
  program font whereas in F10.1.2 asin the +/- is in a wider font.

 
Mike
 


  _____  

From: Cfp-interest [mailto:cfp-interest-bounces at oakapple.net] On Behalf Of
Jim Thomas
Sent: 02 January 2023 23:57
To: CFP
Subject: [Cfp-interest 2575] Re: CFP review of NB comments on CD


Here's an update to the 2022-12-27 version of my remarks about the NB
comments.  

https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/NB_comments_on_CD-JWT-20230102.pdf

https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/NB_comments_on_CD-JWT-20230102.docx


- Jim Thomas



On Dec 27, 2022, at 5:39 PM, Jim Thomas <jaswthomas at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Below are links for the National Body comments on the C23 CD. 

I made a preliminary pass through to see which ones I think CFP needs to
review. These are indicated by the background color of the comment ID in the
first column under MB/NC:

light grey - these are either editorial and (I think) can be left to the
editor or else are outside the scope of CFP.

yellow - CFP needs to review these.

blue - CFP has already reviewed these and agrees.

I used the column under "Observations of the secretariat" for my comments.

If you see grey or blue comments you think CFP needs to discuss, please
indicate them in email to CFP before our January 4 meeting.

Please review the relevant comments before the meeting. We'll need to decide
on CFP's opinion on them and pass that along to WG 14 ASAP (mailing deadline
is January 9).

https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/NB_comments_on_CD-JWT-20221227.pdf 

https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/NB_comments_on_CD-JWT-20221227.docx 
 

- Jim Thomas
_______________________________________________
Cfp-interest mailing list
Cfp-interest at oakapple.net
http://mailman.oakapple.net/mailman/listinfo/cfp-interest



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20230103/496169ea/attachment-0001.htm>