[Cfp-interest 2583] Re: CFP review of NB comments on CD

[Damian McGuckin]

On Tue, 3 Jan 2023, Mike Cowlishaw wrote:

I've looked at the various comments, and either

a)	agree with them all except for the below,

b)	do not have enough knowledge to more effectively comment.

Specifically, referring to NB_comments_on_CD-JWT-20230102.docx,

Here are my comments to the "Observations of the secretariat" column

Where I use just the number nn-mmm, I mean USnn-mmm.

GB-014	Review - Yes. Should evaluation be done at the best precision possible
 	on a given system. Mind you, that is then not necessarily reproducible

GB-063	Isn't this just editorial?

26-075	I need to bounce this off somebody to understand full ramification

GB-155	I do not understand this but it seems editorial to me.

GB-157	DO WE NEED TO CONSIDER THIS????

GB-164	I do not understand this. Sorry. Does this mean it needs discussion?

GB-173	Do we need to discuss this. Agree with "arrays" -> "array" change.

47-177	DO WE NEED TO CONSIDER THIS???? Or is it too trivial? Agree??

48-178	DO WE NEED TO CONSIDER THIS???? Or is it too trivial? Agree??

GB-179	DO WE NEED TO CONSIDER THIS???? Or is it too trivial? Agree??

49-180	Ditto

51-181	Ditto

52-182	Ditto

GB-267	No idea what is implied here. Isn't it a Word document, not LaTeX

GB-268	I am unclear what is going on here

67-278	I need more context

Sorry for the lateness - Damian

Pacific Engineering Systems International, 277-279 Broadway, Glebe NSW 2037
Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here
Views & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present employer