<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=us-ascii" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 11.00.9600.19431"></HEAD>
<BODY style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space">
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=100382411-03012023><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>I've looked at the various formatting comments, and agree with
them all. Specifically, referring to
NB_comments_on_CD-JWT-20230102.pdf:</FONT></SPAN></DIV><SPAN
class=100382411-03012023><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><BR><FONT color=#000080>p12 US6-023</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT color=#000080> Agree. This already
applies to the pre/postfix operators and the<BR> '-(x), +(x)'
operations, which are already in that font.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT color=#000080> I had originally assumed
that the other plus and minus signs were<BR> intended as explanatory
notes and were not code; however these are<BR> probably intended to mean
the operators found inline in code and so<BR> they should indeed be in
the program font.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT color=#000080> Note that they are that way
in N3XXX.pdf .. so perhaps this comment<BR> is there to allow that
change? I'm not sure which document the<BR> comments are
referring to.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><BR><FONT color=#000080>p20 GB-063</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT color=#000080> Agree. I have checked
the listed cases(6.5.2.1, 6.5.3.3, 6.5.6,<BR> 7.17.7.5).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><BR><FONT color=#000080>p68 GB-261</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT color=#000080> Agree. For example in
F.10.1.1 acos(1) returns +0, the + is in<BR> program font whereas in
F10.1.2 asin the +/- is in a wider font.</FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=100382411-03012023><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=100382411-03012023><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>Mike</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=100382411-03012023><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"
dir=ltr>
<DIV lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT size=2 face=Tahoma><B>From:</B> Cfp-interest
[mailto:cfp-interest-bounces@oakapple.net] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Jim
Thomas<BR><B>Sent:</B> 02 January 2023 23:57<BR><B>To:</B>
CFP<BR><B>Subject:</B> [Cfp-interest 2575] Re: CFP review of NB comments on
CD<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>Here’s an update to the 2022-12-27 version of my remarks about the
NB comments.
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/NB_comments_on_CD-JWT-20230102.pdf</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><A
href="https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/NB_comments_on_CD-JWT-20230102.docx">https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/NB_comments_on_CD-JWT-20230102.docx</A><BR>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>- Jim Thomas</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<DIV>On Dec 27, 2022, at 5:39 PM, Jim Thomas
<jaswthomas@sbcglobal.net> wrote:</DIV><BR
class=Apple-interchange-newline>
<DIV>
<DIV style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space">Below are
links for the National Body comments on the C23 CD.
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>I made a preliminary pass through to see which ones I think CFP needs
to review. These are indicated by the background color of the comment ID in
the first column under MB/NC:</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>light grey - these are either editorial and (I think) can be left to
the editor or else are outside the scope of CFP.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>yellow - CFP needs to review these.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>blue - CFP has already reviewed these and agrees.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>I used the column under “Observations of the secretariat” for my
comments.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>If you see grey or blue comments you think CFP needs to discuss, please
indicate them in email to CFP before our January 4 meeting.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Please review the relevant comments before the meeting. We’ll need to
decide on CFP's opinion on them and pass that along to WG 14 ASAP (mailing
deadline is January 9).</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><A
href="https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/NB_comments_on_CD-JWT-20221227.pdf">https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/NB_comments_on_CD-JWT-20221227.pdf</A>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><A
href="https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/NB_comments_on_CD-JWT-20221227.docx">https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/NB_comments_on_CD-JWT-20221227.docx</A>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>- Jim
Thomas</DIV></DIV>_______________________________________________<BR>Cfp-interest
mailing
list<BR>Cfp-interest@oakapple.net<BR>http://mailman.oakapple.net/mailman/listinfo/cfp-interest<BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>