[Cfp-interest 2535] Re: CFP review comments on C23 draft N3047

[Jim Thomas]

> On Aug 14, 2022, at 11:59 PM, Mike Cowlishaw <mfc at speleotrove.com> wrote:
> 
> Re hyphens, the first of these (7.23.6.1#20 ) in not a case of this:  in code/macros (or in that case, characters produced by a printf) are indeed hyphens.  The ASCII code 45 (hex 2D) is a hyphen [see:  https://www.ascii-code.com/ <https://www.ascii-code.com/>].

Got it. I will remove that one.
>  
> The other case (H.3#6 2nd sentence) does need fixing  (and also a space).
>  
> There are several uses of hyphen in the section I reviewed (5.2.4.2.3), in macros (e.g., 'minimum exponent').
>  
> -----
>  
> Separately, I just noticed that in the list my comments don't specific which section they refer to  (5.2.4.2.3) -- probably because I only put that, and incorrectly(!), in the Subject of my e-mail 2516.   I suggest adding the section number to the list.

I’ve added section numbers to your comments.

- Jim
>  
> Mike
>  
> 
>> From: Cfp-interest [mailto:cfp-interest-bounces at oakapple.net] On Behalf Of Jim Thomas
>> Sent: 15 August 2022 00:24
>> To: CFP
>> Subject: [Cfp-interest 2533] Re: CFP review comments on C23 draft N3047
>> 
>> I suggest adding the following two comments:
>> 
>> JT-110 throughout Check that a hyphen is not used where a minus sign is needed. For example, 7.23.6.1#20 exponent signs and H.3#6 2nd sentence. This expands on Mike’s first comment.
>> JT-111 7.12.17 In several places in the subclauses it appears space is needed in front on a relational operator, e.g. in 7.12.17.1 #2.
>> 
>> I expect these kinds of things will be cleaned up by JeanHeyd else by the ISO editor, but it seems better to mention them.
>> - Jim
>> 
>>> On Aug 12, 2022, at 5:36 PM, Jim Thomas <jaswthomas at sbcglobal.net <mailto:jaswthomas at sbcglobal.net>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Action item:
>>> 
>>>>       Jim: Will make judgment calls on the rest and send it to the group for review for final sending to WG14 on Monday.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Here’s the list of commeents for CFP review:
>>> 
>>> https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/CFP_comments_on_N3047-20220812.b.pdf <https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/CFP_comments_on_N3047-20220812.b.pdf>
>>> 
>>> - Jim Thomas
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20220815/cb2fd3d8/attachment-0001.htm>