[Cfp-interest] N1676 comments spreadsheet updates

[Jim Thomas]

This message follows up on two action items from yesterday's teleconference. It provides words for two proposed changes in the spreadsheet of comments on N1676 (Part 1). Please let me know today if possible if you see any problems with these changes. 


  AI: Jim to send new words for Part 1 comment 17. 

Page 28, Line 22: Change to: 

The value of FP_LLOGB0 shall be LONG_MIN if the value of FP_LOGB0 is INT_MIN, and shall be -LONG_MAX if the value of FP_LOGB0 is -INT_MAX. The value of FP_LLOGBNAN shall be LONG_MAX if the value of FP_LOGBNAN is INT_MAX, and shall be LONG_MIN if the value of FP_LOGBNAN is   INT_MIN.


  AI: Jim to send new words for Part 1 comment 25. 

Page 35, Line 29: Change to:

The issignaling macro determines whether its argument value is a signaling NaN.

To the sentence above, add the footnote:

F.3 specifies that issignaling (and all the other classification macros), raise no floating-point exception if the argument is a variable, or any other expression whose value is represented in the format of the its semantic type, even if the value is a signaling NaN.


-Jim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20130412/8f297962/attachment.html