[Cfp-interest 2181] Re: AI about new wording for unaccepted change

[Mike Cowlishaw]

> On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:46:56 -0700 Jim Thomas wrote:
> >
> >b) The results are not equivalent because they have 
> different quantum exponents.
> >
> 
> How about:
> 
> The results are equal, but have different quantum exponents, 
> hence are not equivalent.

You'd really have to have a special meaning/glossary for 'equivalent' to
explain that, I think.  As written that's:
  
  The results are equal, but have different quantum exponents, 
  hence are not equal [values].

Mike