[Cfp-interest 2180] Re: AI about new wording for unaccepted change

Fred J. Tydeman tydeman at tybor.com
Fri Oct 1 06:09:56 PDT 2021


On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:46:56 -0700 Jim Thomas wrote:
>
>b) The results are not equivalent because they have different quantum exponents.
>

How about:

The results are equal, but have different quantum exponents, hence are not equivalent.

---
Fred J. Tydeman        Tydeman Consulting
tydeman at tybor.com      Testing, numerics, programming
+1 (702) 608-6093      Vice-chair of PL22.11 (ANSI "C")
Sample C99+FPCE tests: http://www.tybor.com
Savers sleep well, investors eat well, spenders work forever.



More information about the Cfp-interest mailing list