[Cfp-interest 2180] Re: AI about new wording for unaccepted change
Fred J. Tydeman
tydeman at tybor.com
Fri Oct 1 06:09:56 PDT 2021
On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:46:56 -0700 Jim Thomas wrote:
>
>b) The results are not equivalent because they have different quantum exponents.
>
How about:
The results are equal, but have different quantum exponents, hence are not equivalent.
---
Fred J. Tydeman Tydeman Consulting
tydeman at tybor.com Testing, numerics, programming
+1 (702) 608-6093 Vice-chair of PL22.11 (ANSI "C")
Sample C99+FPCE tests: http://www.tybor.com
Savers sleep well, investors eat well, spenders work forever.
More information about the Cfp-interest
mailing list