IEEE double extended format
Joel Boney
uunet!hal.com!boney
Tue Feb 2 08:32:00 PST 1993
| From huckansa.hp.com Mon Feb 1 13:03:49 1993
| From: Jerry Huck <huckansa.hp.com>
| Subject: Re: IEEE double extended format
|
| > The IEEE standard 754 does not specify an exact format for double extended
| > but only gives some minimum requirements. It appears to me that a de facto
| > standard has emerged:
| >
| > 1 bit for the sign
| > 15 bits for the exponent
| > 112 bits for the fraction
| > ---
| > 128 bits total
| > 1 implicit bit, so 113 bits for the significand
| >
| > exponent bias of +16383
| >
| > My questions are:
| >
| > 1) Do you think that this is the appropriate format for double extended?
Actually there are 2 "defacto" standards for "extended". One was used on the
M68881/2 and 80387 type hardware and is 80 bits and encoded as:
1 bit for sign
15 bits for exponent
64 bits for the fraction
The other defacto standard is the one you listed.
|
| Yes. The latest architecture manual (part #09740-90039) on PA-RISC
| uses this same format.
The SPARC Version 8 (32-bit) and SPARC Version 9 (64-bit) architectures
use the same format too. We also call it quad.
... stuff deleted
|
| Jerry Huck (huckansa.hp.com)
| Computer System Architecture
| Hewlett-Packard
|
|
-- joel boney
HaL Computer
Vice Chair SPARC Architecture Committee
More information about the Numeric-interest
mailing list