Forward declarations in function prototypes, yet again

[uunet!cwi.nl!Dik.Winter]

 > >the ENTIRE THING is the declaration,and THE ENTIRE THING must be read before
 > >we try to interpret any part. The fact that this declaration happens to have
 > > some sub-pieces that look like other declarations is not relevant.

 > If you're talking about the programming language C, then the above is not
 > correct.

One situation where it is clearly incorrect is the following:
	int foo(struct x {int i;} t) { return t.i;}
Which is legal (although silly).  The parameter declarations *are* in fact
true declarations in ANSI C.  (Also in old-style C, but there the declaration
is of type int, but only provisionally, with the option to modify it through
actual specification.)