[cfp-interest 3806] Re: Conflicting requirements for double_t

[Jim Thomas]

Following up on

>     Jim & Jerome: Draft proposal re. double_t semantics and send a note to Joseph about the proposed solution.

here is a draft proposal:

https://cfp-wiki.esi.com.au/pub/CFP/WebHome/C2Y proposal - conflicting requirements for double_t-20260226.pdf?_t=1772896897 <https://cfp-wiki.esi.com.au/pub/CFP/WebHome/C2Y%20proposal%20-%20conflicting%20requirements%20for%20double_t-20260226.pdf?_t=1772896897>

- Jim and Jerome
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20260307/d659cfad/attachment.htm>