[Cfp-interest 3011] Re: C23 editorial review draft

[Fred J. Tydeman]

On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 22:48:12 +0000 Rajan Bhakta wrote:
>
>As a reminder, CFP has agreed to review the sections where any floating-point changes have happened.
>

Fred's comments:

References to page numbers are printed pages (not PDF pages).

"need not" is still in the document:  
 page 43, footnote 45
 page 47, footnote 52
 page 62, footnote 69
 page 191, footnote 215
 page 209, footnote 236
 page 319, footnote 309
 page 323, footnote 312
 page 329, footnote 318
 page 365, footnote 346
 page 415, footnote 387

Clicking on left side table of contents does not work -- goes to page i.

"revision" -> "edition" on pages xiii, 55, 188, 189, 291, 457, 458,
459, 625, 674.

Do not like that the page footers no longer have the clause number.
But, it was due to **-135.

It is not clear to me when "family" should be in an index entry:
 Page 689: canonicalize has family, while cacos does not.
 Page 708, index entry "strfromd 358" should be  "strfromdN 358"
 Page 708, index entry "strtod 360, 361" should be  "strtodN 360, 361"
 Page 708, index entry "wcstod 435, 436" should be  "wcstodN 435, 436"

 Index is missing "family" for 
 "...dN function"
 "...dNx function"
 "...fN function"
 "...fNx function"
 eg, ... is acos, acosh, and so on to tgamma, trunc
End of "family" issue.

Should there be "strfromencf32" and  "strfromencf64" on page 614?


---
Fred J. Tydeman        Tydeman Consulting
tydeman at tybor.com      Testing, numerics, programming
+1 (702) 608-6093      Vice-chair of INCITS/C (ANSI "C")
Sample C17+FPCE tests: http://www.tybor.com
Savers sleep well, investors eat well, spenders work forever.