[Cfp-interest 3180] Re: use of "can not" in N3301 5.2.2.4p13

[Jim Thomas]

> On Aug 11, 2024, at 2:20 AM, Vincent Lefevre <vincent at vinc17.net> wrote:
> 
> On 2024-08-10 09:03:46 -0700, Jim Thomas wrote:
>> Hmm. In N3220 the problematic “can not” had been changed to “is not
>> permitted to”, which has the intended meaning. But subsequent drafts
>> have reverted to “can not”.
> 
> N3096 already had "is not permitted to". Which draft had "can not"
> before it was changed to "is not permitted to"?

My mistake. I don’t see any older drafts with “can not”. Apparently it was just introduced, and previous drafts were ok.

- Jim Thomas

> 
> -- 
> Vincent Lefèvre <vincent at vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
> _______________________________________________
> Cfp-interest mailing list
> Cfp-interest at oakapple.net
> http://mailman.oakapple.net/mailman/listinfo/cfp-interest