[Cfp-interest 3088] Re: csinh(x + i y) - G.6.3.5 - 5th bullet point of special cases

[Damian McGuckin]

On Sun, 7 Apr 2024, Jim Thomas wrote:

> Conjugate, odd, and even were used where it seemed the extra bullets 
> required to do otherwise would expand the specification unduly. Using 
> them was not an absolute principle. For example, a better grouping of 
> the bullets might have seemed more important. There might be 
> inconsistencies here that would be important to remove, but we need to 
> ask whether a considered change would lead to an overall significantly 
> clearer specification?

Following the "not an absolute principle" but looking for "a clearer 
specification", I have now gone through it and made some changes. I will 
release it shortly.

Thanks - Damian