[Cfp-interest 2687] Re: WG14 IEEE 754-C binding meeting minutes 2023/01/31
Jim Thomas
jaswthomas at sbcglobal.net
Sun Feb 5 21:40:20 PST 2023
> On Feb 1, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Vincent Lefevre <vincent at vinc17.net> wrote:
>
> On 2023-01-31 20:45:29 +0000, Rajan Bhakta wrote:
>> Definition of “floating types”
>> See [Cep-interest 2654]
>> Rajan: As long as float_t and double_t have to be standard floating types, then we are good and there is no contradiction since real floating types contains standard floating types.
>> Fred: We should change float_t and double_t to be real floating types since right now they could be complex.
>> Needs to be looked at further.
>
> Yes, float_t and double_t should probably be real floating types,
Yes.
> but "real floating types" should properly be defined. In N3088,
> there is 6.2.5p14 saying
>
> The standard floating types and the decimal floating types are
> collectively called the real floating types.
>
> where "real floating types" is *not* in italics. So it looks like
> a definition, but it isn't really. This is confusing.
We can propose italicizing “real floating types” in 6.2.5 #14.
> BTW, there
> is also an issue with H.2.4 Classification of real floating types,
> in particular #6 ("real floating types are classified as follows"),
> which does not include float_t and double_t.
It does because float_t and double_t are real types. This was assumed, and the change above makes it explicit.
>
> Note that at least 6.3.1.8 "Usual arithmetic conversions" needs to
> be updated to take that into account (and H.4 too?).
Why? They are intended to have the behavior of the real type they are defined to be.
- Jim Thomas
>
> In 6.2.5, it should also probably be said that some definitions
> are modified in Annex H (note that there are also _DecimalNx, and
> new complex and imaginary types there).
>
> --
> Vincent Lefèvre <vincent at vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
> _______________________________________________
> Cfp-interest mailing list
> Cfp-interest at oakapple.net
> http://mailman.oakapple.net/mailman/listinfo/cfp-interest
More information about the Cfp-interest
mailing list