[Cfp-interest 2544] Fwd: Round 2 editorial reveiw

[Jim Thomas]

I’ve sent the CFP second round review comments to the WG14 reviewers.

- Jim Thomas

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Jim Thomas <jaswthomas at sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: Re: Round 2 editorial reveiw
> Date: September 10, 2022 at 3:52:51 PM PDT
> To: David Keaton <dmk at dmk.com>
> Cc: Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>, Rajan Bhakta <rbhakta at us.ibm.com>, Alex Gilding <agilding at perforce.com>, Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt at inria.fr>, Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery.com>, Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis at gmail.com>, Robert Seacord <rcseacord at gmail.com>, "Fred J. Tydeman" <tydeman at tybor.com>, JeanHeyd Meneide <phdofthehouse at gmail.com>, Freek Wiedijk <freek at cs.ru.nl>
> 
> Here are CFP comments for the second round review:
> 
> 

https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/CFP_second_round_comments_on_N3054-for_WG14-20220910.pdf <https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/CFP_second_round_comments_on_N3054-for_WG14-20220910.pdf>

(This link is to a copy of the file sent to WG14 reviewers.)

> 
> - Jim
> 
>> On Sep 2, 2022, at 4:07 PM, David Keaton <dmk at dmk.com> wrote:
>> 
>>    Thanks again for volunteering to review the draft C standard before it is sent for CD ballot.  I've attached the draft after the first round of editing.  This is in the process of becoming an N-document, but I wanted to offer you a chance to get a head start. Some people prefer to review during business hours, and others prefer to review during weekends and holidays.
>> 
>>    The scope of this second round review is:
>> 
>> 1.  Have the first round comments been addressed in some way (maybe different from what was suggested, but has the problem been resolved)?
>> 
>> 2.  Now that these edits have been applied, does the surrounding context still make sense?  In other words, are we still faithful to the papers that were recently voted in?
>> 
>>    This is not a time to look for text that was not recently changed; that should have been done long ago.  We are behind schedule and in danger of pushing into 2024, so we need to maintain our focus.
>> 
>>    This review will conclude on Monday, September 12, at 24:00 UTC (5pm Pacific time).  There will not be a third round.  Any edits from this second review will be applied as appropriate, and then the draft will be submitted for CD ballot.  Any comments after the September 12th deadline must go through the ballot process.
>> 
>>    Thanks again for your help.
>> 
>> 					David<N3XXX.pdf>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20220910/9fd83d5b/attachment.htm>