[Cfp-interest 2328] Re: current C2x draft

[Jim Thomas]

Thanks for the review draft, JeanHeyd. By when do you want the review comments in order to incorporate them into the new draft you refer to?

I think CFP should be providing a strictly editorial review for this draft. In particular, we check that the review draft correctly (up to editorial license) includes the changes in the WG 14-approved proposals listed at the front of the draft. If we see new problems — anything other than a clearly editorial mistake — CFP can discuss those at its upcoming meetings. 

Fred, will you be able to review the changes for the proposals you submitted? I believe those are

2710  2711  2714  2715  2716  2755  2790

Rajan, will you be able to review the changes for 2823?

I’ll review the changes for the proposals I submitted. I believe those are (in the order listed in the review draft):

2651  2670  2671  2672  2751  2745  2748  2749  2747  2805  2806  2842  2843  2845  2846  2848

Other CFP member are encouraged to review the draft too. Please copy Cfp-interest on any comments about editorial mistakes (see above) sent to JeanHeyd. Please send any other review comments just to Cfp-interest.

- Jim Thomas

> On Jan 13, 2022, at 5:44 PM, JeanHeyd Meneide <phdofthehouse at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Vincent Lefevre and CFP Group,
> 
>      Sorry for the slowness! I requested a paper number. I'm going to be submitting the new C draft (with the Annex) soon. The Annex X is still being moved over to Annex H, but here's a draft with all the other changes currently merged (Annex H, Language Independent Arithmetic, has been removed but all that's there is the title in this version of the document). It should also include all of the editorial remarks/papers from you, Vincent, Fred, Robert, Jim Thomas, and a few others:
> 
>       https://drive.google.com/file/d/181mR0YnQlm9CcITfDTNPjkYAAj9Jp6om/view?usp=sharing <https://drive.google.com/file/d/181mR0YnQlm9CcITfDTNPjkYAAj9Jp6om/view?usp=sharing>
> 
>       Its final number when I get it should be around N29XX. Sorry for the delay!
> 
> Sincerely,
> JeanHeyd Meneide
> 
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 7:33 PM Vincent Lefevre <vincent at vinc17.net <mailto:vincent at vinc17.net>> wrote:
> In Cfp-interest 2305 and 2313:
> 
>  8) Note that the current C2X draft is still n2596.pdf.
> 
> but n2731.pdf has been available for several weeks:
> 
>   http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2731.pdf <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2731.pdf>
> 
> and still says "ISO/IEC 9899:202x".
> 
> So, what's the actual status?
> 
> -- 
> Vincent Lefèvre <vincent at vinc17.net <mailto:vincent at vinc17.net>> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/ <https://www.vinc17.net/>>
> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/ <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>>
> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
> _______________________________________________
> Cfp-interest mailing list
> Cfp-interest at oakapple.net <mailto:Cfp-interest at oakapple.net>
> http://mailman.oakapple.net/mailman/listinfo/cfp-interest <http://mailman.oakapple.net/mailman/listinfo/cfp-interest>
> _______________________________________________
> Cfp-interest mailing list
> Cfp-interest at oakapple.net
> http://mailman.oakapple.net/mailman/listinfo/cfp-interest

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20220114/7baabbcd/attachment.htm>