[Cfp-interest 2362] Re: WG14 meeting homework for CFP

[Jim Thomas]

Yes, I think we need to add the “fNx” and “dNx” prefixes. So the new text should be:

	…, then P is double if the macro prefix is f, d, fN, or fNx and P is _Decimal64 if the macro prefix is dN or dNx; otherwise …

- Jim Thomas

> On Feb 2, 2022, at 8:18 AM, Rajan Bhakta <rbhakta at us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I will provide an update on our papers soon, but basically we had all of them pass with one exception that requires some homework from our group before the next week of the WG14 meeting:
> 
> N2849: Do we need to add in the macro prefixes dNx and fNx?
> 
> This was brought up by Joseph and I think he's right. For the _Decimal32x and _Float32x narrowed results I think this is correct. We should add it. What does the rest of the group think?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Rajan Bhakta
> z/OS XL C/C++ Compiler Technical Architect
> ISO C Standards Representative (Canada, USA), PL22.11 Chair
> C/C++ Compiler Development
> rbhakta at us.ibm.com
> 
> IBM
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cfp-interest mailing list
> Cfp-interest at oakapple.net
> http://mailman.oakapple.net/mailman/listinfo/cfp-interest

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20220202/d99cc0d6/attachment.htm>