[Cfp-interest 2533] Re: CFP review comments on C23 draft N3047
Jim Thomas
jaswthomas at sbcglobal.net
Sun Aug 14 16:23:39 PDT 2022
I suggest adding the following two comments:
JT-110 throughout Check that a hyphen is not used where a minus sign is needed. For example, 7.23.6.1#20 exponent signs and H.3#6 2nd sentence. This expands on Mike’s first comment.
JT-111 7.12.17 In several places in the subclauses it appears space is needed in front on a relational operator, e.g. in 7.12.17.1 #2.
I expect these kinds of things will be cleaned up by JeanHeyd else by the ISO editor, but it seems better to mention them.
- Jim
> On Aug 12, 2022, at 5:36 PM, Jim Thomas <jaswthomas at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> Action item:
>
>> Jim: Will make judgment calls on the rest and send it to the group for review for final sending to WG14 on Monday.
>
>
> Here’s the list of commeents for CFP review:
>
> https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/CFP_comments_on_N3047-20220812.b.pdf <https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/CFP_comments_on_N3047-20220812.b.pdf>
>
> - Jim Thomas
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20220814/213520be/attachment.htm>
More information about the Cfp-interest
mailing list