[Cfp-interest 2518] Fwd: Editorial review

Jim Thomas jaswthomas at sbcglobal.net
Thu Aug 11 10:11:10 PDT 2022



> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery.com>
> Subject: Re: Editorial review
> Date: August 11, 2022 at 10:04:38 AM PDT
> To: Jim Thomas <jaswthomas at sbcglobal.net>
> Cc: David Keaton <dmk at dmk.com>, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>, Rajan Bhakta <rbhakta at us.ibm.com>, Alex Gilding <agilding at perforce.com>, Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt at inria.fr>, Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis at gmail.com>, Robert Seacord <rcseacord at gmail.com>, "Fred J. Tydeman" <tydeman at tybor.com>, JeanHeyd Meneide <phdofthehouse at gmail.com>, Freek Wiedijk <freek at cs.ru.nl>
> 
> Thanks.  I've filed 
> https://gitlab.gwdg.de/iso-c/draft/-/merge_requests/304 for reverting this 
> change and https://gitlab.gwdg.de/iso-c/draft/-/issues/250 for mentioning 
> CR_DECIMAL_DIG in Annex B.
> 
> -- 
> Joseph S. Myers
> joseph at codesourcery.com
> 
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2022, Jim Thomas wrote:
> 
>> I don’t remember any proposal including this change and am not aware of a reported error suggesting it.
>> 
>> - Jim Thomas
>> 
>>> On Aug 10, 2022, at 11:34 AM, Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I note that one of the changes in commit 
>>> 8c261504064ac833f2d3f5b0a541aef6ee854eb4 ("Many editorial fixes for a lot 
>>> of reported errors") was that CR_DECIMAL_DIG is no longer conditional on 
>>> __STDC_WANT_IEC_60559_EXT__.  I'd like to confirm if this is an 
>>> intentional change, since I'm not aware of any associated accepted paper.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Joseph S. Myers
>>> joseph at codesourcery.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20220811/6fe34860/attachment.htm>


More information about the Cfp-interest mailing list