[Cfp-interest] C Standard meeting 18661 DR's result

[Fred J. Tydeman]

Quoting Rajan Bhakta <rbhakta at us.ibm.com>:

> Hi,
>
> In the C meeting, the review of the proposed defects and resolutions for
> the IEEE 754 C binding Technical Specification came up with the following:
>
>   TS 18661 DR's: [N 2029]
>     TS18661-1:
>     1) Marked as DR1-1
>     2) Marked as DR2-1
>     3) Editorial. Can be published with a TC.
>     4) Marked as DR3-1

C11 DR 477 mentions that there should be a DR against TS 18661-1.
Is such a DR needed?  Did we do that?

Also, I think the DR numbering above is backwards.
I think it should be DR1-1, DR1-2, DR1-3
(that is, part number-DR number).
-- 
Fred J. Tydeman        Tydeman Consulting
tydeman at tybor.com      Testing, numerics, programming
+1 (775) 358-9748      Vice-chair of J11 (ANSI "C")
Sample C99+FPCE tests: http://www.tybor.com
Savers sleep well, investors eat well, spenders work forever.