[Cfp-interest] Part 1-3 drafts posted: Part 1

[Fred J. Tydeman]

On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:09:42 -0700 Jim Thomas wrote:
>
>> 
>> PDF page 26, lines 26-28: Do we want SNANF32, SNANF64, SNANF80 (or
>> SNANF64X), SNANF128?
>
>No. For example, SNANF and Part 3's SNANF32 have different types.

Part 3, PDF page 8, last paragraph mentions redundant ways to
refer to the same format.  So, I am somewhat confused.

Part 3, PDF page 10, ISSUE 2 mentions that Part 1 5.1 should be
split to match Part 3.  Seems like now would be a good time to
do that.

---
Fred J. Tydeman        Tydeman Consulting
tydeman at tybor.com      Testing, numerics, programming
+1 (775) 287-5904      Vice-chair of PL22.11 (ANSI "C")
Sample C99+FPCE tests: http://www.tybor.com
Savers sleep well, investors eat well, spenders work forever.