[Cfp-interest] Part 3 suggested 6.2.5 [10a]

[Jim Thomas]

If the implementation defines __STDC_IEC_60559_DFP__ it must be supporting Part 2 and so already has _Decimal32, _Decimal64, and _Decimal128.

-Jim

On Feb 20, 2013, at 5:55 AM, "Mike Cowlishaw" <mfc at speleotrove.com> wrote:

> Looks OK to me too .. but I'm now wondering why there isn't a corresponding __STDC_IEC_60559_DFP__ ?   
>  
> Mike  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20130220/867116e8/attachment.html