[Cfp-interest] format - type names issue

[Jim Thomas]

Fred J. Tydeman wrote:

>On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:30:45 -0800, Jim Thomas wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Given that the existing names for imaginary and complex types have the 
>>associated real type first (e.g., float complex), it seems more 
>>consistent with C style to place _Complex and _Imaginary last.
>>    
>>
>
>Both
> float complex
> complex float
>are valid C99.
>
>As per 6.7.2 Type specifiers may occur in any order.
>  
>
All instances in the C standard have _Complex, _Imaginary, complex, or 
imaginary last.

>---
>Fred J. Tydeman        Tydeman Consulting
>tydeman at tybor.com      Testing, numerics, programming
>+1 (775) 358-9748      Vice-chair of PL22.11 (ANSI "C")
>Sample C99+FPCE tests: http://www.tybor.com
>Savers sleep well, investors eat well, spenders work forever.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Cfp-interest mailing list
>Cfp-interest at oakapple.net
>http://mailman.oakapple.net/mailman/listinfo/cfp-interest
>
>
>  
>