[Cfp-interest] format - type names issue

[Fred J. Tydeman]

On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:30:45 -0800, Jim Thomas wrote:

>Given that the existing names for imaginary and complex types have the 
>associated real type first (e.g., float complex), it seems more 
>consistent with C style to place _Complex and _Imaginary last.

Both
 float complex
 complex float
are valid C99.

As per 6.7.2 Type specifiers may occur in any order.

---
Fred J. Tydeman        Tydeman Consulting
tydeman at tybor.com      Testing, numerics, programming
+1 (775) 358-9748      Vice-chair of PL22.11 (ANSI "C")
Sample C99+FPCE tests: http://www.tybor.com
Savers sleep well, investors eat well, spenders work forever.