[Cfp-interest 2213] Re: quantum

[Vincent Lefevre]

On 2021-10-06 15:01:00 +0100, Mike Cowlishaw wrote:
> There was some problem with the term 'ulp' so 754 stopped using it
> (I think it was because the size of a ulp can change suddenly when
> normalizing? I forget ...).

There are different definitions, where ulp differs on the power of
the radix. Could this be the reason, in order to avoid confusion?

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent at vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)