[Granville-Hough] 2-4 Apr 2009 - Blue Language And the Jakewalk Blues
Trustees and Executors for Granville W. Hough
gwhough at oakapple.net
Mon Jun 28 06:21:07 PDT 2010
(GWH. Harold Hopkins and I were schoolmates in Mize Grade School, Mize,
MS. As he was almost a year older than I, he was in the grade ahead of
mine. He became a journalist and worked for several government agencies
in Washington, DC, in public relations. He prepared this article for
the Food and Drug Administration about 1980. It seems most fitting that
someone with personal experience with a victim of this Jakeleg malady
got an opportunity to study it and see how it developed.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
/From _FDA Consumer, _June 1980.
/Prohibition, that noble experiment, is a chapter in America's
history that will forever be studied and interpreted. For one thing,
the era encouraged lawbreaking -- often on a widespread scale and
sometimes with tragic results. Here's the story of one such tragedy and
FDA's role in stemming it./
By Harold Hopkins
/Harold Hopkins is editorial director of _FDA Consumer./
Fifty years ago when I was 8 and my dad was 34 (c 1930), we did some
horse swapping. I taught him to walk. He taught me to cuss.
He had developed a strange paralysis in his lower legs and feet, and
the doctor had told him he'd never walk again, and he said he'd be
swizzzled if that was so, and that's how I entered the picture as his
eldest -- and at that time only -- son. In that summer of 1930 a part
of the house was cleared of family clutter to make room for the business
of walking. Dad would get up from his chair, holding onto me for
support. As we started across the room he's let go, wave me away, and
start out on his own. in a step or two his legs would crumple under him
and he'd sprawl headlong, full length across the floor, unable to drop
to his knees to break the fall. Then he'd empurple the air with
profanity signifying his pain and frustration. I'd help him up, and
he'd try again across the room, hour upon hour, day after day.
Every time he fell there came a string of oaths, with some
imaginative variations. I had heard him swear before at what he called
his 'Gimp" hand when it, at times, refused to do whe he expected of it
because it had stopped a piece of shrapnel years before I was born or
even thought of (WW I). Now he had a pair of gimp legs, and the
epithets he heaped upon them were eloquent with authority.
Although my end of the bargain was the easier one, I did get him
walking again -- a grotesque, floundering mockery of a man headed
somewhere. It wasn't the finest of walks but it did get him to most of
the places he wanted to go, though not again to the woods, fields, and
streams that he loved to roam with gun or pole.
In those silent distant summer days, as he sprawled helplessly on
the floor, I learned to cuss too, and I had reason. Not long prior to
the onset of paralysis he had, one morning, given in to my childish
wheedling and had taken me with him on a hunt through the woods -- my
first. I had to run to keep up. We saw no game, but he showed me how
to aim and shoot the Winchester 20 gage at a piece of newspaper
fastened to a tree. It was the first time I ever fired a real gun and
its roar told me of time to come then the piece of paper would be a
quail, a rabbit, or something bigger.
So in our later walking sessions in that hot southern summer of
1930, as he lay on the floor gathering up his resolve, I swore silently
and methodically at the impersonal, unknown forces that had deprived me
of my hunting partner and made me -- before my two brothers came along
-- the only able bodied male in the house.
There was never any mystery about how he got his paralysis, but only
as I grew older did I come to realize the events leading to it were
neither impersonal nor unknown. My father had become one of thousands
of victims of a part tragedy, part cruel joke known as the Jakeleg, a
numbness and permanent paralysis of the lower legs and feet from
drinking a toxic substance called triorthocresyl phosphate. That
chemical had been illegally used to adulterate a popular
over-the-counter drug product, fluid extract of Jamaica ginger. The
label on Jamaica ginger extract, which its users often called :jake"
recommended it use to relieve several common symptoms, and the usual
dose was a few drops in a glass of sweetened water. But its real
marketability was in its us as an alcoholic beverage by people
frustrated at the 18th amendment's nonsense proscribing the sale of
alcoholic beverages.
Thus, jake was a legal product used illegally. In our State
(Mississippi) it was sold covertly and sometimes openly, depending on
the temperance of the times and place, in drugstores and corner
groceries, by the bottle or by the case. one of the flat 2-oz bottles
fit easily into a shirtpocket.
The Great Jakewalk of 1930 was a mass poisoning that, in number of
lives blighted, made the sulfanilamide tragety of 1937 and the
thalidomide disaster of the late 1950s very small potatoes. Yet,
despite the numbers it affected -- estimates have ranged from 35,000 to
50,000 -- and despite the flurry of popular songs about jakewalking
blues and jakewalking daddies and the sly jokes about little old ladies
and pious parsons laid low by an affliction they could but refuse to
acknowledge, this wide epidemic went relatively unnoticed in the press
and has been largely bypassed in the annals of the Depression years.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Blue Language and the Jakewalk Blues - 2d part, 3 April 2009
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I can't eat, I can't talk;
Been drinking mean Jake, Lord, now can't walk
Ain't got nothin' to lose,
For I'm a Jake walkin' papa, with the Jake walk Blues,"
from "The Jake Walk Blues," by the Allen Brothers, 1930.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For one thing, the largest number of victims were concentrated in
States mostly dry by local ordinance or traditional temperance leaning.
Here the drugstore had been doing business in jake -- produced since
1863 -- long before Prohipition became effective. For another, a great
many of the jake victims were ashamed at being caught in their illicit
pleasures and were reticent, sometimes stubbornly so, about letting
their names be added to the growing statistics produced by jake. To
many people the miscreants brought down by Jakeleg were simply overtaken
by a just retribution for flouting that most hallowed of U. S.
Documents, the Constitution. A proposal by a hastily formed association
representing some of the victims, asking Congress to give them relief on
grounds the Government had failed to protect them from an unwholesome
proprietary medicine, died on the vine.
Some of the victims died too, either directly of the paralysis or of
its complications. Some went to bed to stay. Some settled for life in
a wheelchair. Some eventually progressed to crutches or walking canes.
Some, like my father, became able to walk again unassisted, their
flapping, uncertain gait making them the objects of ridicule. A few
lightly afflicted victims recovered almost completely.
The climate that made the Jakeleg epidemic possible was almost
predictable -- an outcome of the difficulty of enforcing Prohibition,
abetted by bootlegger's greed. Those enforcing the Nation Prohibition
(Volstead) Act did not take long to discover that some people were
escaping its effect by drinking a drug product called tincture of
Jamaica ginger, an alcoholic mixture with just enough of the expensive
Jamaican variety of ginger for flavoring.
At first, the prohibition Agency required the bottlers of these
tinctures to operate with a special permit, but as it became obvious
that jake was being used almost exclusively as a beverage, the Agency
restricted marketing to the almost undrinkable fluid extract of ginger.
Agents announced that tey would seize any product that they found did
not meet the U. S. Pharmacopoeia's specifications for fluid extract of
ginger, which called for so much ginger solids to be dissolved in the
alcohol that most people found the mixture too hot to drink as a
beverage. That satisfied the Prohibition Agency, which considered it
officially nonpotable. A spoonful in a glass of sweetened water was all
most people could swallow.
Some drank the supernot stuff anyway, spiking it or chasing it with
a milder beverage such as soda pop, but the U.S.P. Formula requirement
effectively knocked the bottom out of the legal jake trade. Some of the
Jake makers and their clients -- whose main jobs were to verify that the
alcohol they purchased from various sources was potable and not cut with
water and other cheaper ingredients -- were directly affiliated with
bootleggers, from whom they got their alcohol. They looked for ways to
get around the Prohibition Agency requirement. Into some jake went
various ingredients the formulators felt would neutralize the ginger or
substitute for it and still get past the Agency's chemical tests. The
key to expanding sales was to use nonginger ingredients difficult to
identify by routine Government tests.
These were tricks of the bootleg trade, old stuff to those who had
long operated outside the law. Alcohol would be bought from illegal
sources and fluid extract of ginger from a legitimate comany, and these
could be mixed with various adulterants to neutralize or mask the
stronger taste. Typical ingredients were rosin, castor oil, and balsam
of tolu. Although some were not necessarily harmful, they had no place,
and thus were illegal in the U.S.P. version of flluid extract of ginger.
Most of these ingredients were difficult to identify in jake, given
the state of field analytical chemistry in 1930. This minor difficulty
did not seem of earthshaking importance. At this time -- 8 years before
enactment of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act -- the Food and Drug
Administration operated under the Food and Drug Act of 1906. Under that
law a drug product did not have to be proved safe before marketing, of
for that matter, effective either. FDA applied most of its attention to
drugs considered potentially the most dangerous. Since jake up to that
time seemed relatively harmless, and since the tough Prohibition Agents
were looking at jake manufacturers very closely, that product was not
one of FDA'a major concerns.
Then the Jakeleg epidemic hit.
Late in February 1930, several cases of a peculiar paralysis came to
the attention of doctors in an Oklahoma City hospital. Then the
Oklahoma City Health Department reported around 60 cases of the same
malady. Then epidemic reports began coming from several states almost
simultaneously. in each the signs of paralytic effects became apparent
about 10 days after drinking jake.
By April 23 a total of 536 cases were on record in 39 Oklahoma
counties and, since many of the victims were ashamed and reluctant to
report their affliction and its cause, health authorties estimated the
actual number at 1,500 to 2,000. Other large outbreaks occurred in
Southern and Midwestern States: Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia,
Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, Missouri, and Kansas. Smaller epidemics were
reported in Rhode Island, Maine, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, New York,
New Jersey, New Hampshire, and Indiana.
From the beginning, there was never any question that the paralysis
came from drinking jake. And almost as quickly the batches of poisoned
jake were traced by FDA or Prohibition Agents through dealers and
distributors to one firm in Boston, Hub Products Co., which also
operated under several other names, including Fulton Specialty Co.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Blue Language And the Jakewalk Blues, 3rd part - 4 April 2009.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GWH: In considering the way the judges and lawyers in Boston handled this
case, one must conclude that the judge was a victim of astounding
ignorance, and/or mistrust of government agencies from Washington, DC,
or susceptible to bribery or other coercion. There is little doubt
that, today, US firms trading in arms, chemical stocks, and raw drugs
are so influential that they make a mockery of any effort to suppress
illegal drug trafficking. The question before us is this: Would
legalizing drugs improve the situation? If we say YES, then how would
we go about it?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA's chief of drug control, J. J. Durrett, made an investigative
swing through the South where some of the lagrest outbreaks of Jakeleg
had occurred. Upon returning, Durrett wrote to the chief of FDA's
Eastern District about watching an experiment in New Orleans in wicch a
pig was paralyzed when given some of the poisoned jake. And he
addedddd: "We cannot escape the impression that somewhere around the Hub
Products Co. and its products the answer (to the cause of the poisoning)
is to be found."
It was. While Durrett was urging the prompt collection of samples
of the poisoned jake to build a case against Hub, the chief of FDA's New
York Station, Joseph Callaway Jr., reported to Washington that his
laboratories had extracted from a jake sample "an oily residue
resembling phenol." Before 1930 was out that "oily residue" had been
identified by other Government chemists as the poisonous substance
triorthocresyl phosphate.
By mid-summer Federal grand juries in several cities had returned
indictments against Hub's principals -- Harry Gross, President, and Max
Reisman, his brother-in-law and part owner. When FDA investigators went
to the Hub plant at 65 Fulton Street, Boston, Gross refused permission
for them to inspect it and told them to return the next day. They did,
but samples given them contained no unusual substances. Hub Products
closed down its operations immediately. Investigators of the
Prohibition Agency and FDA made seizures in a number of cities, but too
often in tracing shipments from Hub to distributors they found that the
evidence had already been drunk. Enough of the poisoned product were
intercepted in various cities, however, to weave together a strong web
of evidence implicating Hub Products.
In February 1931, the several cases pending against Gross and
Reisman were consolidated for trial in Boston, and the two men were
charged with conspiracy to violate, and with violations of the National
Prohibition Act's prohibition against selling jake as an alcoholic
beverage and of the adulteration and misbranding provisions of the Food
and Drugs Act of 1906. Both men pleaded guilty. The two men were
sentenced to 2 years imprisonment and fined $1,000 each. However, the
jail sentence was suspended and both were placed on probation for 2
years. FDA men, who had worked so hard to bring the cases to court,
were stunned. The light sentences were later said to have been given in
a plea bargaining arrangement under which the defendants were to present
evidence that would convict the "real" culprits, the New York
bootleggers from whom Gross claimed he got all his products..
As a result of this arrangement, Gross and Reisman and their lawyers
met and conferred in Mid-May of 1931 with Haven Parker, assistant U. S.
Attorney in Boston, but the information they offered was nebulous and
insubstantial. The New York culprits had evaporated.
FDA was particularly miffed becaused it representatives were not
asked to this conference. On May 31, 1931, George H. Adams, chief of
FDA's Boston Station reported evidence to headquarters that traced the
sale of 135 ballons of triothoocresyl phosphate to Hub Products Co.
Under the trade name Lyndol -- a plasticizer manufactured by the
Celluloid Co., Newark, N. J. and used as an ingredient in lacquers and
othe chemical products -- this chemical had been sold to Hub by a
chemical products broker, Raffi and Swanson, Boston. This was enough
triorthocresy phosphate to adulterate 200 barrels of jake or 640,000
2-oz. bottles.
The failure of the conference with Gross and Reisman to provide
solid evidence against the New York bootleggers they claimed were
responsible for the poisoned jake strengthened the FDA's determination
to find the source of the contamination. Trials had been held in New
York and elsewhere and a number of people convicted of selling the
poisoned product, but evidence of who performed the original
adulteration was not established.
After conducting its own investigation in New York, FDA concluded
that both Gross and Reisman were lying about the origins of the
poisoning and thus had violated the terms of their probation. The
Agency decided to probe further in Boston.
George White, a former employee at Hub, told investigators that he
had received the barrels of Lydol, left them on the third floor of the
Hub premises, where they were removed to the fourth floor by Gross and
the empty containers returned afterward. White said he had no access to
the fourth floor, which was kept locked at all times, and that Hub's
goods apparently were shipped out at night because he would see them
near the elevator n the third floor when he left for the day and they
would be gone when he returned in the morning. Adams presented this
information to the U.S. Attorney.
On April 1 1932, Gross was charged with violating probation and
ordered to serve his 2-year prison term. Later Judge James A. Lowell
refused to hear the Government's case asking revocation of Reisman's
probation.
Other charges of selling poisoned jake had been brought against
Gross and Hub Products in December 1931 and had been tried January 25
1932. The defendants pleaded guilty and the only sentence was a fine of
$1, Judge Lowell explaining that these cases should be considered a part
of the earlier ones, for which the defendants had already been punished.
The jake poisoning events of 1930 showed plainly that legislation
was needed to require premarket testing to assure the safety of drugs
sold in the United States. The strongest charges that could be brought
against the men responsible for so many deaths and permanent cripplings
were that they conspired to ship and had shipped large quantities of
adulterated and misbranded drugs "consisting of approximately 1,000
gallons of a product called 'fluid extract of ginger,' and sometimes
called 'Liquid Medicine in Bulk,' which differed from the standard of
strength, quality, and purity as determined by the tests laid down by
the United States Pharmacopoeia for fluid extract of ginger."
Some observers of the widespread Jakeleg epidemic of 1930 considered
it more joke than jake, and in a way it was, a grim and lasting
remindeer of the country's noble, adventurous, and sometimes hilarious
dozen years with legally imposed temperance. When the Nation was voting
to go dry in 1918, my father was in France and had no say in the
matter. But the notion didn't set well with him and he had no intention
whatever of letting the agents respoonsible for enforcing Prohibition
deter him from taking a drink, if he could find one. Just 3 years shy
of Repeal, when happy days were just ahead, he and 35,000 other revelers
found one drink too many.
More information about the Granville-Hough
mailing list