<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2> I apologize for my simplistic view of the differences between the Roman Catholic and the Episcopalian churches.
<BR>Perhaps the one glaring difference is that the Episcopalian church, as indeed, the Anglo Saxon Catholic Church, tends towards verbal dogmatism, as opposed to the Latin (in American and European countries) Catholic practices where the religious participation with the church is based on spiritual and emotional feelings and not on dogma.
<BR>A Roman Catholic all my life, and as suited to the church as a fish to water, I do not know, and have never thought about, religious dogmas or any other other attempted verbalizations of what to me is a special connection with the spiritual wonders of times gone by, times to come, and the very present. . The word religion, of Greek origin, signifies, after all, "linking back".
<BR>For me personally, either one feels the link or one doesn't, and any attempt to put the effort or the process into regulated and regulatory verbal definitions seems oxymoronic and futile. Yet, we humans are so diverse and complex that most significant emotions by necessity need be experienced differently.
<BR>But I do know that I feel as religiously comfortable in Episcopalian churches as my
<BR>Episcopalian friends, including priests, appear to feel in mine.
<BR>The word Catholic, after all, means "universal"; A part of the Episcopalian Mass, somewhere in the middle, calls for blessings for the Catholic Church. Quite moved by the ecumenicalism of such sentiment the first time I heard it, I went to the priests to give thanks for the Episcopalian prayers on behalf of my church. Well, I was promptly set straight.
<BR>It doesn't matter. Substantially, and beyond procedural forms and distractions, we are one and the same, as we realize all too well when we meet each other in the Camino. Bless it!
<BR>Affectionate regards,
<BR>Rosina
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR></FONT></HTML>