<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: Reply a la Pederson</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">
Since i just joined, the introductory info is fresh in my memory, and there is a request that personal replies be made just to the person, not to the whole list, as there is a limit to the number of postings allowed per day. Here's the info I received:<BR>
<BR>
<TT>2. Number of messages:<BR>
One potential problem is overuse of "gocamino." The listserv at UCLA was<BR>
quite popular and active. The University of Rhode Island (URI) limits our<BR>
number of postings per day. I don't believe that we'll top their limit, but<BR>
please reduce unnecessary non-germane discussions, comments, personal<BR>
queries by addressing them to the specific individual(s). In short, if the<BR>
e-mail contains substantive information, then it should appear on<BR>
"gocamino." If it's a private comment, then it's a private e-mail. That<BR>
means the "thank-you's" and the "I agree completely" messages should go<BR>
directly to the individual.<BR>
Reminder: When you hit "reply" to a listserv message, your reply goes to<BR>
all subscribers. Please attentive to the "send to" message line, and send<BR>
private replies directly to the individuals.<BR>
<BR>
Ellen Grunblatt<BR>
aplsosamainewest.com<BR>
</TT><BR>
----------<BR>
From: Felipe Sanchez <felipsanaOLYPEN.COM><BR>
To: GOCAMINOaPETE.URI.EDU<BR>
Subject: Reply a la Pederson<BR>
Date: Fri, Feb 15, 2002, 7:01 PM<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE>Pederson:<BR>
I am affronted at your boorishly masculine behavior which borders on contumely. Upon reading your diatribe to my friend Andrea, I quickly reviewed the original correspondence relating to Gocamino subscription. Nowhere did I discern a list of rules and regulations that direct contributors toward subjects and themes that fall within specifically defined confines. Nor was I informed that a University sponsored the newsgroup and that the institution of higher learning had proffered benchmarks for epistolary behavior. Without any guidance, then, how can we, the contributors, direct our efforts toward any communicative goal except by spontaneity and good will? But more importantly how can you have the presumptive brazenness to speak for the rest of us while demonstrating a graceless lack of enlightenment in regard to your treatment of Andrea? I wrote once of liberty and freedom and their dependence for vitality and continuity upon the tolerance with disparity as demonstrated by the individual members of any society in question. If my observation is correct then by dint of your own works you have demonstrated an autocratic inclination favoring fascism rather than freedom.<BR>
<BR>
Please note that I do not tell you what, when, where, or how to write. You are free to do what you please as also should be Andrea. I only make decisions about my self. My most recent decision is to post a message daily with my e-mail address for the period of one week so that anyone wishing to maintain correspondence with me may do so. After one week I shall unsubscribe. Furthermore if you were the one that wrote me about a reunion in Seattle of Camineros I request that my name be extirpated from the list. I shall never understand how some people can walk a path through life and never see the sky...Felipe Sanchez<BR>
<FONT COLOR="#0000FF"><U>felipsanaolypen.com</U></FONT> <<FONT COLOR="#0000FF"><U>mailto:felipsanaolypen.com</U></FONT>> <BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE> <BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>