<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;
panose-1:2 11 0 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<div id="mail-editor-reference-message-container">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hello Alex,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Comments on N3581 from CFP:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> In the Impact section: Put the “I” replacement code into the standard somewhere. Perhaps in the complex.h section as a note (7.3.1)? CFP can do it as a paper if requested, but it would be better to be in this paper. As an aside, it
should be <complex.h> not <complex> in the paper.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> In the 7.3#3 change: N3537 changes the same text (merge conflict), so just a note to be sure we get the right final text.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> In 6.7.11#28 change: In 6.2.5#17 we talk about how to write complex values ("x + iy”). “… c with value 5.0 + i 3.0" should be “c with value 5 + i 3" since it is a value (math), not a C expression. Perhaps also change 'j' to be another
variable name since electrical engineers use j for the imaginary unit to avoid even more confusion.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> In 7.3.9.5 change: Does not account for N3536. N3536 makes this all go away (uses the CMPLX macro). Suggest removing this.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> In the G.3.2#5 change: Doesn't take into account the latest working draft. Not sure what the change means. Possibly obsolete?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Regards,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>