<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;">Hi JeanHeyd,<div><br></div><div>In case this isn’t already addressed, please note that in n3219 the typeface for instances of f, f(-x), f(x), x, and -f(x) in the first two sentences in F.10 #3 should be like the typeface for f, f(-z), f(z), z, and -f(z) in G.6.1 #9.</div><div><br></div><div>- Jim Thomas</div><div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>Begin forwarded message:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;"><span style="font-family: -webkit-system-font, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 1.0);"><b>From: </b></span><span style="font-family: -webkit-system-font, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Jim Thomas <jaswthomas@sbcglobal.net><br></span></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;"><span style="font-family: -webkit-system-font, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 1.0);"><b>Subject: </b></span><span style="font-family: -webkit-system-font, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>[Cfp-interest 3077] Re: Generic Mathematical functions</b><br></span></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;"><span style="font-family: -webkit-system-font, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 1.0);"><b>Date: </b></span><span style="font-family: -webkit-system-font, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, sans-serif;">April 6, 2024 at 8:38:44 AM PDT<br></span></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;"><span style="font-family: -webkit-system-font, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 1.0);"><b>To: </b></span><span style="font-family: -webkit-system-font, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Damian McGuckin <damianm@esi.com.au><br></span></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;"><span style="font-family: -webkit-system-font, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 1.0);"><b>Cc: </b></span><span style="font-family: -webkit-system-font, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, sans-serif;">CFP Interest <cfp-interest@oakapple.net><br></span></div><br><div><div><br><br><blockquote type="cite">On Apr 6, 2024, at 1:06 AM, Damian McGuckin <damianm@esi.com.au> wrote:<br><br><br>Annex F<br><br>F.10 Clause 3<br><br>For each single-argument function f in <math.h> whose mathematical counterpart is symmetric (even), f(-x) is f(x) for all rounding modes and for all x in the (valid) domain of the function.<br><br>The font for 'f' and its argument is Courier Bold which is normally only reserved for an actual name, like say 'asinpi' and not its argument.<br><br>Compare this with .....<br><br>Annex G.<br><br>G.6.1 Clause 9.<br><br>If the function f is also either even, f(z) = f(-z), or odd, f(-z) = -f(z), then the specifications ...<br><br>The font here for both the function and the argument is Italic.<br><br>Should it be a consistent font?<br></blockquote><br>Yes. It should all be like what’s in G.6.1 #9. There were review comments about global inconsistencies in typeface. I suppose this might be fixed in the coming final C23 draft.<br><br>- Jim Thomas<br><br><blockquote type="cite"><br>Thanks - Damian<br>_______________________________________________<br>Cfp-interest mailing list<br>Cfp-interest@oakapple.net<br>http://mailman.oakapple.net/mailman/listinfo/cfp-interest<br></blockquote><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Cfp-interest mailing list<br>Cfp-interest@oakapple.net<br>http://mailman.oakapple.net/mailman/listinfo/cfp-interest<br></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>