<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;">Regarding action item<div><br></div><div><blockquote type="cite"><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"> Jim: Add a footnote to Part 4, Clause 6 when it describes dN for N != 32, 64, 128 to say N = 32, 64, 128 are covered due to them being 60559 types and covered in Annex F.</p></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div>I suggest adding a footnote in Clause 6 to the sentence:</div><div><br></div><blockquote style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><div>An implementation shall declare the functions suffixed with <b>d</b><i>N</i> for <i>N</i> ≠ 32, 64 or 128 or with <b>d</b><i>N</i><b>x</b> only if it supports the corresponding decimal floating type and the macro <b>__STDC_WANT_IEC_60559_TYPES_EXT__</b> is defined at the point in the code where <b><reduc.h></b> is first included.</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>where the footnote is:</div><div><br></div><blockquote style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><div>For <i>N</i> = 32, 64 and 128, the functions suffixed with <b>d</b><i>N</i> shall be declared if the implementation supports decimal floating types (i.e. defines <b>__STDC_IEC_60559_DFP__</b>), without the requirement that the macro <b>__STDC_WANT_IEC_60559_TYPES_EXT__</b> be defined.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></blockquote>Please send any comments to CFP ASAP.<div><br></div><div>- Jim Thomas<br><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></body></html>