<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><a class="gmail_plusreply" id="gmail-plusReplyChip-0" href="mailto:liaison@lists.isocpp.org" tabindex="-1">+liaison@lists.isocpp.org</a><div><a class="gmail_plusreply" id="plusReplyChip-1" href="mailto:sc22wg14@open-std.org" tabindex="-1">+ISO C</a> <br></div><div></div></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="gmail_attr"><a class="gmail_plusreply" id="plusReplyChip-2" href="mailto:cfp-interest@ucbtest.org" tabindex="-1">+CFP</a> <br></div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr"><br></div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 5:00 AM Jonathan Wakely <<a href="mailto:cxx@kayari.org">cxx@kayari.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 22:54, Hubert Tong via Lib-Ext <<a href="mailto:lib-ext@lists.isocpp.org" target="_blank">lib-ext@lists.isocpp.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Why would C not want to use the fetch_min and fetch_max names?</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>C doesn't support atomic_fetch_add etc on floating-point types. Is there any suggestion that WG14 might want to change that? Because if they don't support atomic arithmetic on floating-point types, it seems unlikely they'd want to support atomic min/max on floating-point types. In which case, it doesn't matter what semantics C++ gives those names for floating-point types.<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Good point. I am forwarding this question (whether the C committee has interest in whether atomic_fetch_min/atomic_fetch_max applies fminimum/fmaximum/fminimum_num/fmaximum_num/etc. semantics) to the C/C++ liaison, WG 14, and C Floating Point study group reflectors.</div><div><br></div><div>[Cringing at the cross-list posting, but not sure what else to try.]<br></div><div><br></div></div></div>