<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;"><div>Below is an update to the version we reviewed at the CFP meeting today. It addressed action items:</div><div><br></div><div><blockquote type="cite"><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"> Jim: CFP response to US42-169 should be copy the nextafter returns section, changing "nextafter" to "nexttorward".<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"> Jim: Add in a link to CFP 2657 into CFP's response for GB-287.</p></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div>and is a draft for: </div><div><br></div><div><blockquote type="cite"><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"> Jim: Submit a CD comment resolution document for US42-169, GB-286, GB-287.</p></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div>Please review and sent any comments by noon PST, Thursday, February 2.</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/WG14_issues_with_response_to_NB_comments-20230131.pdf">https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/WG14_issues_with_response_to_NB_comments-20230131.pdf</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>- Jim Thomas</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></body></html>