<html><body><p><font size="2" face="sans-serif">Good point, I should have made that explicit. The inclusive version tries to do what the proposal above mentions: Only have the query functions for the rounding mode since they are the only practical set. I will explicitly state that in the inclusive version.</font><br><font size="2" face="sans-serif">The access functions were in the exclusive version list since they were just query functions and though they would have no practical use, they didn't harm anything either.</font><br><br><font size="2" face="sans-serif">Regards,<br><br></font><font size="2" face="sans-serif"><b>Rajan Bhakta</b></font><font size="2" face="sans-serif"><br>z/OS XL C/C++ Compiler Technical Architect<br>ISO C Standards Representative (Canada, USA), PL22.11 Chair<br>C/C++ Compiler Development</font><br><font size="2" face="sans-serif">rbhakta@us.ibm.com</font><br><br><font size="2" face="sans-serif">IBM</font><br><br><img width="16" height="16" src="cid:1__=8FBB0D43DFCE60B78f9e8a93df938690@ibm.com" border="0" alt="Inactive hide details for "Fred J. Tydeman" ---01/20/2022 10:57:59 AM---On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:02:31 -0500 Rajan Bhakta wrote: "><font size="2" color="#424282" face="sans-serif">"Fred J. Tydeman" ---01/20/2022 10:57:59 AM---On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:02:31 -0500 Rajan Bhakta wrote: ></font><br><br><font size="1" color="#5F5F5F" face="sans-serif">From: </font><font size="1" face="sans-serif">"Fred J. Tydeman" <tydeman@tybor.com></font><br><font size="1" color="#5F5F5F" face="sans-serif">To: </font><font size="1" face="sans-serif">"Jim Thomas" <jaswthomas@sbcglobal.net>, "Rajan Bhakta" <rbhakta@us.ibm.com></font><br><font size="1" color="#5F5F5F" face="sans-serif">Cc: </font><font size="1" face="sans-serif">"CFP" <cfp-interest@ucbtest.org></font><br><font size="1" color="#5F5F5F" face="sans-serif">Date: </font><font size="1" face="sans-serif">01/20/2022 10:57 AM</font><br><font size="1" color="#5F5F5F" face="sans-serif">Subject: </font><font size="1" face="sans-serif">[EXTERNAL] [Cfp-interest 2357] Re: Updated (V7) N2823</font><br><hr width="100%" size="2" align="left" noshade style="color:#8091A5; "><br><br><br><tt><font size="2">On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:02:31 -0500 Rajan Bhakta wrote:<br>><br>>Addressing all of Jim's and Fred's comments. Note that I do intend to<br>>update this one time at the end to add in better structure (title, author,<br>>revision number, etc. as the heading) and summarizing the reflector<br>>messages as Jens asked in the motivation section.<br><br>I notice that the (exclusion version) lists more <fenv.h> functions<br>than the (inclusive version). Why are the FP exception flags<br>access functions in the list?<br><br><br>---<br>Fred J. Tydeman Tydeman Consulting<br>tydeman@tybor.com Testing, numerics, programming<br>+1 (702) 608-6093 Vice-chair of PL22.11 (ANSI "C")<br>Sample C99+FPCE tests: </font></tt><tt><font size="2"><a href="http://www.tybor.com">http://www.tybor.com</a></font></tt><tt><font size="2"> <br>Savers sleep well, investors eat well, spenders work forever.<br></font></tt><br><br><BR>
<BR>
</body></html>