<html><body><p><font size="2" face="sans-serif">Other issues (beyond the papers up for vote that I mentioned last message) were as follows. My notes (or interpretation) are in <>.</font><br><br><font size="2" face="sans-serif"> 1.6 Review of Action Items and Resolutions</font><br><font size="2" face="sans-serif"> Fred: -1^Inf sent to the IEEE reflector. No responses.</font><br><font size="2" face="sans-serif"> <Not a new action item, more of an FYI as to the response to the action item we had from last meeting.></font><br><font size="2" face="sans-serif"> 2.7 Austin Group [N 2723]</font><br><font size="2" face="sans-serif"> AI: Fred: Respond to the Austin group on the remquo bug.</font><br><font size="2" face="sans-serif"> <Fred already proposed something himself. I believe we should get CFP to chime in as well after we discuss it></font><br><font size="2" face="sans-serif"> 3.3 C and C++ Compatibility Study Group</font><br><font size="2" face="sans-serif"> AI: CFP: Create a one page summary of the CFP changes for C++.</font><br><font size="2" face="sans-serif"> <This is an action item for CFP to give a one page summary to C++ liaison study group of the changes to C based on the CFP TS's that have been adopted into C23.></font><br><br><font size="2" face="sans-serif">Regards,<br><br></font><font size="2" face="sans-serif"><b>Rajan Bhakta</b></font><font size="2" face="sans-serif"><br>z/OS XL C/C++ Compiler Technical Architect<br>ISO C Standards Representative (Canada, USA), PL22.11 Chair<br>C/C++ Compiler Development</font><br><font size="2" face="sans-serif">rbhakta@us.ibm.com</font><br><br><font size="2" face="sans-serif">IBM</font><BR>
<BR>
</body></html>