<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">For the WG14 2020/11

meeting, here is a summary of what happened with our papers. Note there

was very little discussion and all papers basically flew through.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">N2579: C2X proposal

- TS 18661-3 annex update 2</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">  Not discussed

since superseded by N2601. See discussion for N2601 below.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">N2586: Footnote

about sufficient formatting precision</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">  Straw poll:

Should N2586 go into C23?</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">   

13/0/3.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">   

N2586 goes into C23.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">N2600: Revised

N2559 update for IEC 60559 2020 <span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">  Straw poll:

Put N2600 into C23?</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">   

16/0/3.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">   

N2600 goes into C23.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">N2601: C2X proposal

- TS 18661-3 annex update 3</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">  Accepted

as is.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">N2602: C2X proposal

- Edits for infinity and NaN macros</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">  Joseph:

N2617 D#_ -> DEC_ applies.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">  Straw poll:

Put N2602 into C23 with the prefix updates to DEC_?</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">   

12/0/5.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">   

Put N2602 into C23 with the prefix updates to D#_ -> DEC_. <span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">N2580: DFP triples <span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">  David S:

The C convention with +1 = positive, and -1 being negative, is it documented

anywhere?</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">   

Fred: Yes, in 5.2.4.2.2#2.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">  Alex: This

is not changing the C convention?</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">   

Fred: Yes, correct. Not changing C. Just a clarification. <span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">  Straw poll:

Put N2580 into C23?</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">   

13/0/4.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">   

Put N2580 into C23.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Regards,<br><br><b>Rajan Bhakta</b><br>z/OS XL C/C++ Compiler Technical Architect<br>ISO C Standards Representative (Canada, USA), PL22.11 Chair<br>C/C++ Compiler Development</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">rbhakta@us.ibm.com</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">IBM</span><BR>