<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"> <b>Attendees</b>:
Rajan, Jim, Fred, Mike, Damian, David O., Ian, David H.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><b> New
agenda items:</b></span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
None.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><b> Carry
over action items:</b></span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
None.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><b> Last
meeting action items</b>: All done. Discussed below.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim: Submit the Annex B update (CFP 1743) to WG14.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim/Rajan: Create a slide deck for WG14 showing the substantial changes
for Annex X (TS part 3) based on CFP 1754.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim: Submit CFP 1737's paper to WG14.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim/David H: Submit a proposal based on CFP 1732 to WG14.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
David H: Check that the IEEE references in CFP 1749's paper are in an acceptable
form.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Fred: Make CFP 1675 into a paper without the addition of 'triple' to the
index.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim: Create a WG14 proposal for the discussion in CFP 1736 (footnote 296).</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Fred: Rewrite the paper based on CFP 1754 including changes to paragraph
4.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><b> New
action items:</b></span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Fred: Get a paper number and submit CFP 1760 to WG14.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim: Submit CFP 1758 with the addition of a reference to the property referenced
in Problem 2.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Fred: Rework CFP 1759 to better word and position the footnote.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim: Remove default argument promotion from slide deck and proposal for
Part 3 as an Annex. Submit them as WG14 updated papers.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><b> Next
Meeting(s):</b></span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Wednesday, October 23rd, 2020, 11:00 EST, 8:00 PST, 4PM UTC</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
ISO Zoom teleconference</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Please notify the group if this time slot does not work.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><b> C++
liaison:</b></span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
None.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"> </span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><b> C2X
Integration:</b></span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Latest C2X draft: </span><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IbngZ8StYVVYASd3WWuC4Uu9Xs39AF_N/view?usp=sharing"><span style=" font-size:10pt;color:blue;font-family:sans-serif">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IbngZ8StYVVYASd3WWuC4Uu9Xs39AF_N/view?usp=sharing</span></a><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"></span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Link on CFP wiki</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Latest C2X draft diffmarks: </span><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1x4-eIBbQU3aXuORoNPSixbbl_ZKKfWfu/view?usp=sharing"><span style=" font-size:10pt;color:blue;font-family:sans-serif">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1x4-eIBbQU3aXuORoNPSixbbl_ZKKfWfu/view?usp=sharing</span></a><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Previous C2X draft: </span><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2478.pdf"><span style=" font-size:10pt;color:blue;font-family:sans-serif">http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2478.pdf</span></a><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Part 1</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Part 2</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Part 3</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Part 4ab</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Part 5abcd</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
IEEE 754-2019 support</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim: The latest C2X draft (Part 1, 2, 4a, IEEE-754:2020 min/max) has a
number of our new proposals in it. Fred and I have given comments.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><b> Action
item details</b></span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim: Submit the Annex B update (CFP 1743) to WG14.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
[Cfp-interest 1762] AI to submit proposal for Annex B with prototype
forms</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
On agenda for October WG14 meeting.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim/Rajan: Create a slide deck for WG14 showing the substantial changes
for Annex X (TS part 3) based on CFP 1754.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
[Cfp-interest 1766] AI to create a slide deck for TS3 annex update</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Some changes considered below, which may update the slides.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim: Submit CFP 1737's paper to WG14.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
[Cfp-interest 1765] AI to submit proposal about feature and WANT
macros for Annex F functions</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
On agenda for October WG14 meeting.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim/David H: Submit a proposal based on CFP 1732 to WG14.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
[Cfp-interest 1763] AI to submit proposal about short hex strings</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
On agenda for October WG14 meeting.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
David H: Check that the IEEE references in CFP 1749's paper are in an acceptable
form.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
[Cfp-interest 1756] ISO Standard citation</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
[Cfp-interest 1757] ISO predecessor</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Looks good. Just removed IEEE from the list of organizations.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Fred: Make CFP 1675 into a paper without the addition of 'triple' to the
index.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
[Cfp-interest 1760] Re: WG14 IEEE 754-C binding meeting minutes
2020/08/19</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim: Include the reference document in the list of changes when
submitting</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
*AI*: Fred: Get a paper number and submit CFP 1760 to WG14.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim: Create a WG14 proposal for the discussion in CFP 1736 (footnote 296).</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
[Cfp-interest 1758] AI about sufficient formatting precision</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Mike: Don't like having case being a discriminator, but it's fine.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim: David H, Can you look at problem 2 property and find a reference
in the literature for it?</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
David H: It's old, communications in ACM in the late 60's
may have it. I can dig up the reference. Can check with some other people
as well.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
*AI*: Jim: Submit CFP 1758 with the addition of a reference to the
property referenced in Problem 2.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Fred: Rewrite the paper based on CFP 1754 including changes to paragraph
4.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
[Cfp-interest 1759] Exact subnormal results</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim: My change to the footnote is to better fit what's in the text
of the standard in that context.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Fred: Seems good to me.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Fred: DBL_MAX + DBL_MAX is exact, but not full precision.
Is that a range error for double-double?</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Ian: It may or not be exact.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
David H: It is like a gradual overflow.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim: The footnote may be better in the paragraph about underflow
(near footnote 245).</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim: Raising a really good point about overflow that needs to be
looked at. Perhaps do both underflow and overflow.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Fred: Underflow is undefined, implementations can do whatever,
while overflow has requirements.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
*AI*: Fred: Rework CFP 1759 to better word and position the footnote.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim: Can raise other issues to for the CFP group.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><b> Other
issues</b></span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Updating C2X to IEC 60559:2020</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
[Cfp-interest 1764] C2X update to IEC 60559:2020 Jim Thomas</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
On the WG14 agenda.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
TS3 Annex update</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
[Cfp-interest 1761] TS 18661-3 annex update submitted Jim Thomas
Comments from Joseph Myers</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
[Cfp-interest 1768] Re: (SC22WG14.18328) Comments on N2561 (TS 18661-3
as Annex update)</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Looking at slide deck.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Rajan: Currently doesn't address Joseph's comments.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
CFP 1768:</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
David O: Not tied to it, so good either way. If we change,
I will change the C++ proposal to match CFP.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Jim: Recommend removing it from our proposal.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
*AI*: Jim: Remove default argument promotion from slide deck
and proposal for Part 3 as an Annex.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Fred: The subset statement X.2.3#2 is beyond what 754 says.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Tgmath updates look good.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Agree with the example updates as well.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Prep for WG14 October meeting</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Papers on agenda:</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
5.x Tydeman, Missing DEC_EVAL_METHOD [N 2546]</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
5.x Tydeman, Missing 'const' in decimal getpayload functions [N
2547]</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
5.x Tydeman, intmax_t and math functions [N 2548]</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
5.x Thomas, F.3 editorial cleanup for rounding macros [N 2552]</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
5.x Thomas, C2X proposal - Annex B with prototype forms [N 2558]</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
5.x Thomas, C2X proposal - Update to IEC 60559 2020 [N 2559]</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
5.x Thomas, C2X proposal - FP hex formatting precision [N 2560]</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
5.x Thomas, C2X proposal - TS 18661-3 annex update [N 2561]</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
5.x Tydeman, Range errors and math functions [N 2564]</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
5.x Thomas, C2X proposal - Feature and want macros for Annex F functions
[N 2570]</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><b> Others?</b></span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
For emails, especially Jim, try to send to CFP instead of CFP and cc the
original author when replying to emails. This may stop the duplicate notes.</span><BR>