<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Hello,</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">The WG14 telecon
meeting went well. Here are the papers of interest to our group and the
results (I am listing Fred's non-CFP paper at the end).</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">6.17 Thomas, C2X
proposal - NaN and infinity macros [N 2469]</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"> Joseph:
Should keep it, should be expand to arithmetic constant expressions.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"> Fred: A
NaN doesn't qualify as a constant expression from the current definition.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Joseph: Incidentally, INFINITY only needs magic because of the FENV_ROUND
pragma; without that pragma, you can just write a constant with a sufficiently
large exponent (that doesn't violate constraints when infinities are supported,
see the DR#025 response).</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"> Poll: Should
N2469 be put into C2X?</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"> Final Vote:
0/8/7. No consensus.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">6.21 Thomas, C2X
proposal - why no wide string strfrom functions - updates n2475 [N 2490]</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"> Poll: Does
WG14 want N2490 to go into C2X?</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"> Vote: 13/0/1.
Consensus.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">8.1 Thomas, C2X
proposal - Names and locations [N 2476] </span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"> Change
1: Does the committee want this?</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Vote: 14/0/1. Consensus.</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"> Change
2: Does the committee want this?</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Vote: 9/1/7</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">
Not clear consensus, but passes.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Non-CFP but of
possible interest to us:</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">6.2 Tydeman, printf
of NaN() [N 2446] </span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"> Straw poll:
Should N2446 go into C2X?</span><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"> Vote: 14/0/1.
Consensus.</span><br><br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Regards,<br><br>Rajan Bhakta<br>z/OS XL C/C++ Compiler Technical Architect<br>ISO C Standards Representative for Canada, PL22.11 Chair (USA)<br>C Compiler Development<br>Contact: rbhakta@us.ibm.com, Rajan Bhakta/Houston/IBM</span><BR>