<font size=2 face="sans-serif">I thought this was supposed to be a part
of the 754-2019 update from what I remember, but it does seem we forgot
to add it to the list of those changes for the document we did have WG14
review.</font><br><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Regards,<br><br>Rajan Bhakta<br>z/OS XL C/C++ Compiler Technical Architect<br>ISO C Standards Representative for Canada, PL22.11 Chair (USA)<br>C Compiler Development<br>Contact: rbhakta@us.ibm.com, Rajan Bhakta/Houston/IBM</font><br><br><br><br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">From:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Jim Thomas <jaswthomas@sbcglobal.net></font><br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">To:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">CFP <cfp-interest@ucbtest.org></font><br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Date:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">11/01/2018 03:07 PM</font><br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Subject:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">[Cfp-interest]
payload spec for C2X integration draft</font><br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Sent by:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cfp-interest-bounces@oakapple.net</font><br><hr noshade><br><br><br><tt><font size=2>I’m working on our action item from WG 14 to prepare
drafts for parts 1 and 2 that include CR/DRs that were closed as of the
end of the fall WG 14 meeting (plus editorial changes). <br><br>Regarding <br><br>DR 12<br>Reference Document: N2125<br>Subject: P1: Zero payloads and set payload function<br><br>I see that the CFP working draft for part 1 contains a more recent update
to the payload functions than was in N2125. This more recent update, which
was motivated by 754-2019 clarifications to the meaning of “payload”,
is from the unnumbered CFP document “NaN payload functions”, 2018-03-28,
which was reviewed and approved at the April 2018 CFP meeting. But I don’t
see anything about our presenting the changes to WG14. Did we forget to
do that? Did we intend to present the more recent changes as part of our
support for 754-2019? Or did we regard the changes (beyond N2125) to be
editorial?<br><br>- Jim Thomas<br>_______________________________________________<br>Cfp-interest mailing list<br>Cfp-interest@oakapple.net<br></font></tt><a href="http://mailman.oakapple.net/mailman/listinfo/cfp-interest"><tt><font size=2>http://mailman.oakapple.net/mailman/listinfo/cfp-interest</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2><br><br></font></tt><br><br><BR>