<font size=2 face="sans-serif"> <b>Attendees</b>: Rajan, Jim, Mike,
Ian, David C., David H.</font><br><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><b> New agenda items:</b></font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Teleconference number
backup.</font><br><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><b> Last meeting action items:</b></font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Rajan: Bring up "Understanding"
points 4 and 5 when discussing DR501 (from Jim's email on 2017/03/17).
- Done.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> David H: Ask about the
IEEE dependencies (rounding mode, infinities) for the augmented functions
and how they could be used for non-IEEE formats. - Done.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Jim: Ask David Keaton
what we should be doing to close off the group or extend it (IEEE-754:2018
binding for example). - Done.</font><br><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><b> New action items:</b></font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Jim: Reword </font><a href="http://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/augop_spec-20170422.pdf"><font size=2 color=blue face="sans-serif">http://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/augop_spec-20170422.pdf</font></a><font size=2 face="sans-serif">to have the additions done in Annex F only.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Jim: Work </font><a href="http://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/min-max_names.pdf"><font size=2 color=blue face="sans-serif">http://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/min-max_names.pdf</font></a><font size=2 face="sans-serif">into a specification for the main body of the standard. Also add a footnote
saying for implementations without NaN's the functions have the same results.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> All: Look into any other
teleconferencing facility (Ex. Cisco Webex, Skype, etc.) to have a backup
in case the main one fails.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> </font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><b> Next Meetings:</b></font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Tuesday June 20th, 2017,
12:00 EDT, 9:00 PST</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Tuesday July 11th, 2017,
12:00 EDT, 9:00 PST</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Same teleconference number.</font><br><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><b> Discussion:</b></font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> IEEE 754 revision:</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Progress on min/max
and augmented functions.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Augmented for non-IEEE:
Depends on what the other formats handle it.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Non-issue
from the 754 committee.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Result:
Put in Annex F when we work on this.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> A meeting will
coincide with the ARITH conference (Sunday, July 23rd).</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> NaN encoding with
reserved bits is being discussed.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Looking
at a distinction between error NaNs and missing value NaNs.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Not compatible
change.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Avoids the
need of separate functions for each use of NaN.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Thinking
of finding a way to make the two kinds compatible.</font><br><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> C++ liaison:</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> No update.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> </font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> WG14 meeting:</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Note sent out by
Rajan in April.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> </font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> C2x proposals:</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> See note sent by
Rajan in April 6th.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> </font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DRs (</font><a href="http://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/Defect_reports_-_TS_18661-20170425_Sheet1.pdf?twiki_redirect_cache=0d161c3411487fb5082b05aa84198691"><font size=2 color=blue face="sans-serif">http://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/Defect_reports_-_TS_18661-20170425_Sheet1.pdf?twiki_redirect_cache=0d161c3411487fb5082b05aa84198691</font></a><font size=2 face="sans-serif">):</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DR9: See if Blaine
had the proposed changes from our paper folded into the DR.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DR11: For binary
it is the number of digits after the decimal point, for decimal it is the
total number of digits.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> The reason
is %a is based off of the %e formatting for binary, for decimal it was
modelled after %g.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Was already
this way in the TR.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> This DR
was due to the TR being underspecified.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Result:
Keep it as is and push the understanding that the TR had it this way.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> C DR501:</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Jim: Change
the definition of DECIMAL_DIG to the "widest supported floating POINT
type". A floating point type fits the floating point model and does
not have to be just a float, double or long double that "floating
type" would mean.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> A similar
change could be made for float_t and double_t.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Result:
Make this a proposal to let the current DR close.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> We can integrate
all the changes to the TS's (from these DR's) to get base documents for
C2X input.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> </font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Binding for IEEE 754-2018:</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> augmented add and
multiple operations (</font><a href="http://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/augop_spec-20170422.pdf"><font size=2 color=blue face="sans-serif">http://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/augop_spec-20170422.pdf</font></a><font size=2 face="sans-serif">):</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> *Jim: Reword
to be redone to have everything in Annex F only.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> min/max operations
(</font><a href="http://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/min-max_names.pdf"><font size=2 color=blue face="sans-serif">http://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/min-max_names.pdf</font></a><font size=2 face="sans-serif">):</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> First set
uses the 754 names with some tweaks (no camel-case, num/mag abbreviations,
using _'s).</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Feedback
was to use the first set.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> *Jim: Work
into specification for the main body of the standard. Add a footnote saying
for implementations without NaN's the functions have the same results.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> </font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><b> Other:</b></font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Joseph Myers 14704
email (missing underscores for HUGE_VAL*):</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Will be
handled editorially.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> </font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Teleconference
backup:</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Cisco webex?
Free?</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> *Look into
any other teleconferencing facility (Ex. Cisco Webex, Skype, etc.)</font><BR>