<font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hello,</font><br><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">In the ISO/SC22/WG14 meeting this week,
we went over the floating point DR's that are already open, the new Draft
DR's we proposed, as well as the two proposals for new inclusions into
C2x (TS 18661 parts 1 and 2).</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Here are the results of the meeting:</font><br><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Floating Point Draft DR's:</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DDR1: DR500 (C11)</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DDR2: DR501 (C11)</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DDR3: DR5 (CFP)</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DDR4: DR6 (CFP)</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DDR5: DR7 (CFP)</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DDR6: DR8 (CFP)</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DDR7: DR9 (CFP)</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DDR8: DR10 (CFP)</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DDR9: DR11 (CFP)</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Legend:</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DDR = Draft DR (from paper
N2077, which we submitted to WG14).</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> C11 = Defect report against
C11. A new defect report was opened with the given number. Ex. DR500 =
New defect report against C11 numbered 500.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> CFP = Defect report against
TS 18661 (all parts). A new defect report was opened with the given number.
Ex. DR6 = New defect report against TS 18661 numbered 6.</font><br><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Floating point defect review:</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DR1: Move to review.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DR2: Move to review.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DR3: Move to review.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DR4: Move to review.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DR5: New. Take
Suggested TC as Proposed TC.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DR6: New. Take
Suggested TC as Proposed TC.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DR7: New. Take
Suggested TC as Proposed TC.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DR8: New. Take
Suggested TC as Proposed TC.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DR9: New. Take
Suggested TC as Proposed TC.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DR10: New. Take
Suggested TC as Proposed TC.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> DR11: New. Take
Suggested TC as Proposed TC.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Legend: TC = Technical Corrigendum</font><br><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">C2X proposals:</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> C2x proposal — TS 18661-1 [N
2078 </font><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2078.pdf"><font size=2 color=blue face="sans-serif">http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2078.pdf</font></a><font size=2 face="sans-serif">]</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Adding to SD3 with a note
that the committee clearly expects this to go into C2X.</font><br><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> C2x proposal — TS 18661-2 [N
2079 </font><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2079.pdf"><font size=2 color=blue face="sans-serif">http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2079.pdf</font></a><font size=2 face="sans-serif">]</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Adding to SD3 with a note
that the committee clearly expects this to go into C2X.</font><br><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">For the proposals, the committee was
strongly in favor of putting both parts 1 and 2 into C2X.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">For the DR's, only DR501 had issues
and is still being discussed in the WG14 email reflector. The other defects
seem to be good with regards to our proposed fixes.</font><br><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Regards,<br><br>Rajan Bhakta<br>z/OS XL C/C++ Compiler Technical Architect<br>ISO C Standards Representative for Canada<br>C Compiler Development<br>Contact: rbhakta@us.ibm.com, Rajan Bhakta/Houston/IBM</font><br><BR>