<font size=2 face="sans-serif">Here is the summary from day 1 of the WG14
meeting.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Part 3: No comments. Committee agrees
it is ready for ballot (consensus in the group was no need for a 90 day
review period).</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Part 4: Committee discussion: The new
tanpi, asinpi, acospi should not be a part of the spec and if IEEE does
not specify it then we should not either.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Views:</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Call out the missing
functions as additions but not part of the IEEE spec</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Don't add the functions
if not required by IEEE</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Missing functions straw
poll: Should we keep the new functions added (tanpi, asinpi, acospi).</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> For/Against/Abstain:
11/4/0 - Keep the functions as is.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> Result: 90 day review
from the committee. If very few comments then we bring it forward for PDTS.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Regards,<br>
<br>
Rajan Bhakta<br>
z/OS XL C/C++ Compiler Technical Architect<br>
ISO C Standards Representative for Canada<br>
C Compiler Development<br>
Contact: rbhakta@us.ibm.com, Rajan Bhakta/Houston/IBM</font>