<html><body>
<p><font size="2" face="sans-serif">n1742: Comments on IEEE 754-2008 C Binding Spec Part 1 voting</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> Comments as presented by the CFP group</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> </font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> Presenter: Jim, Using N1754 as the basis (N1742 + Floating point group responses).</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> </font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB1: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB2: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB3: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB4: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB5: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB6 (freestanding): Blaine: Are you saying freestanding programs have to include <stdlib.h>?</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> Jim: No.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> Blaine: How does the "use the features and contents" work?</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> Jim: It can be a reduced header only containing the numeric functions.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB7: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB8: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB9: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB10 (WANT macro): Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB11: (Covered in a DR) </font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB12: (Covered in a DR)</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB13 (not withstanding): John Benito: Suggestion: Add a footnote stating that this is removing the leeway or explain it better.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB14: (Covered in a DR)</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB15: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB16 (Encoding): Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB17: May make implementors decide not to do it due to a lot more work. But also better to fix it.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> David Keaton: Many printf's are limited to 4K due to an internal buffer.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> No DR for this issue in C11 (printf family)</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> Leave it as is.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB18: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB19: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB20: (Covered in a DR)</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB21: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB22: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB23 (Table 2): Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB24 (Table 2): Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB25 (Table 2): Leave it as is. No consensus with WG14 to make any change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB26: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB27: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB28 (p15,25-26): Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB29: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB30: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB31 (WIDTH): Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB32: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB33 (INTN_WIDTH): Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB34 (p27,1-12): Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB35 (p27,33-34): Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB36: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB37 (p30,1-28): Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB38 (p33): Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> GB39: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> </font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> John: Up to us to decide what the next step is: Do another same ballot or move on to the next step (DTS ballot)?</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> The comment from the Netherlands was not an official comment on the ballot.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> We had C++ comments on this ballot too.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> </font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> n1755: </font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> JWT1: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> JWT2: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> John: These types of changes do not need reporting to WG14. They can be made on the editors discretion.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> JWT3: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> JWT4: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> JWT5: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> JWT6: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> JWT7 (_Bool sNAN): Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> JWT8: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> JWT9: Agreed with CFP proposed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> </font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> n1756:</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> No comments.</font><br>
<br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> John: Any objection to moving on to DTS ballot?</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> None.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> Review committee (preference to people not in the CFP group):</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> Fred Tydeman, David Keaton, John Benito</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> Will review n1756 + additional missed change.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> Blaine: When is the yy replacement (year) happen?</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"> Done after the last ballot. The only change before publish.</font><br>
<br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">Regards,<br>
<br>
Rajan Bhakta<br>
z/OS XL C/C++ Compiler Technical Architect<br>
ISO C Standards Representative for Canada<br>
C Compiler Development<br>
Contact: rbhakta@us.ibm.com, Rajan Bhakta/Houston/IBM</font></body></html>