[From nobody Tue Jul 27 15:38:06 2010 Received: from smtp1.cup.hp.com (smtp1.cup.hp.com [16.89.217.160]) by adlmail.cup.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_35483)/8.9.3 SMKit7.04) with ESMTP id KAA02700; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from g1t0027.austin.hp.com (g1t0027.austin.hp.com [15.216.28.34]) by smtp1.cup.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79039525C5C; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alphaone.ieee.org (listserv.ieee.org [140.98.193.12]) by g1t0027.austin.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0A43862E; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:48:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from HOME (alphaone [140.98.193.12]) by alphaone.ieee.org (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id o6RGO2pr016151; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:42:57 -0400 Received: by LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 16.0) with spool id 5760283 for STDS-754@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:42:56 -0400 Received: from engine.ieee.org (engine.ieee.org [140.98.193.23]) by alphaone.ieee.org (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id o6RHgrFp026200 for <stds-754@listserv.ieee.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:42:53 -0400 Received: from gemini3.ieee.org (gemini3.ieee.org [140.98.193.188]) by engine.ieee.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/) with ESMTP id o6RHgn5E031392 for <stds-754@IEEE.ORG>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:42:49 -0400 Received: from gemini3.ieee.org (gemini3.ieee.org [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4661160B62 for <stds-754@IEEE.ORG>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:42:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hormel6.ieee.org (hormel6.ieee.org [140.98.193.229]) by gemini3.ieee.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B7C160B5A for <stds-754@IEEE.ORG>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:42:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.scsi.com (static-96-236-66-11.snfcca.dsl-w.verizon.net [96.236.66.11]) by hormel6.ieee.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id o6RHgnXk015660 for <stds-754@IEEE.ORG>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:42:50 -0400 Received: by mail.scsi.com (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 340CF722062; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:42:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grumpy (static-96-236-66-10.snfcca.dsl-w.verizon.net [96.236.66.10]) by mail.scsi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E1072205E; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:42:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.scsi.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=10.0 tests=BAYES_00,DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,HELO_NO_DOMAIN autolearn=no version=3.3.1 From: "Bob Davis" <bob@scsi.com> To: "'Jim Thomas'" <jwthomas@CUP.HP.COM>, "'Dan Zuras IEEE'" <forieee@nonabelian.com> Cc: "'Golliver, Roger A'" <roger.a.golliver@intel.com>, "'stds-754@ieee.org'" <stds-754@IEEE.ORG>, "'Cornea, Marius'" <marius.cornea@intel.com> References: <588992150B702C48B3312184F1B810AD03E3DC53B2@azsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com> <ADDEBCD9C145E542A8688C29F1FBDCB92B67C3B3@orsmsx502.amr.corp.intel.com> <20090402074314.DE33EE2E793@zuras.net> <4C4F1933.10101@cup.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <4C4F1933.10101@cup.hp.com> Subject: RE: IEEE 754-2008 and ANSI/IEC/ISO Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:42:33 -0700 Message-ID: <0b4c01cb2db3$1862b8b0$49282a10$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acstsl+CRwX4D8WPQh+bhuz+SRnGgQAAIHwA Content-Language: en-us X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-Spam-Score: 0.00 () [Hold at 10.00] SPF(none,0) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=96.236.66.11; country=US; region=CA; city=Los Gatos; postalcode=95033; latitude=37.1394; longitude=-121.9452; metrocode=807; areacode=408; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=37.1394,-121.9452&z=6 X-IEEE-UCE-Settings: 80_DEFAULT (inherits from default) X-IEEE-UCE-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available X-Scanned-By: IEEE UCE Filtering Service (UCE . ieee . org) on 140.98.193.229 Sender: stds-754@IEEE.ORG Precedence: list List-Help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-754>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-754> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-754-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> List-Subscribe: <mailto:STDS-754-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> List-Owner: <mailto:STDS-754-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Jim, The ISO/IEC is currently balloting the adoption. The US National Body has voted to approve. It is almost there. Bob -----Original Message----- From: stds-754@ieee.org [mailto:stds-754@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Jim Thomas Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 10:37 AM To: Dan Zuras IEEE Cc: Golliver, Roger A; stds-754@ieee.org; Cornea, Marius Subject: Re: IEEE 754-2008 and ANSI/IEC/ISO Dan, Any more current status on an international version of IEEE 754-2008? -Jim Dan Zuras IEEE wrote: >>From: "Golliver, Roger A" <roger.a.golliver@intel.com> >>To: "stds-754@ieee.org" <stds-754@IEEE.ORG> >>CC: "Cornea, Marius" <marius.cornea@intel.com> >>Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:31:39 -0700 >>Subject: RE: IEEE 754-2008 and ANSI/IEC/ISO >> >> >>Marius asked me to forward his question, >>as he seems to be dripped from the list. >>(I've made a request for him to get back on) >>Roger >> >>________________________________ >>From: Cornea, Marius >>Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:20 AM >>To: stds-754@ieee.org >>Cc: Cornea, Marius >>Subject: IEEE 754-2008 and ANSI/IEC/ISO >> >>Hi, >>Does anyone know the answer to these questions - >>The old IEEE Standard 754-1985 used to be referred to sometimes >>as ANSI/IEEE 754-2008. It was also adopted as IEC 559. >> >>Do ANSI and IEC still recognize the old standard as valid? >>If so, do they plan to move to the new one? >>What about ISO? >> >>Thanks, >>Marius Cornea >> >>PS: please use 'reply all' - apparently I am not on the >>stds-754@ieee.org<mailto:stds-754@ieee.org> list anymore >> >> >> > > Roger, > > We are still going through the process on the international > stuff. > > And I thought I got out of hell when it was published. :-) > > Take care, > > Dan > > > > ]