[cfp-interest 4000] Re: ISO Guidelines

[RAJAN BHAKTA]

Hi Damian,

That is correct. No “shall” in recommended practice. And WG14’s guidance is no “shall" in anything other than constraints as a general rule (exceptions always exist) going forward and even backwards (the UB study group is looking to remove these in other areas)!

Regards,

Rajan Bhakta
CFP

From: cfp-interest <cfp-interest-bounces at ucbtest.org> on behalf of Damian McGuckin <damianm at esi.com.au>
Date: Sunday, August 30, 2026 at 11:20 PM
To: CFP Interest <cfp-interest at oakapple.net>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [cfp-interest 3999] ISO Guidelines


In C2Y, we never use 'shall' in clauses which are Recommended Practice.

I assume that is an ISO rule.

Just after an answer. No need to put this into the next meetings topics
for discussion.

Thanks - Damian
_______________________________________________
cfp-interest mailing list
cfp-interest at oakapple.net
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mailman.oakapple.net_mailman_listinfo_cfp-2Dinterest&d=DwICAg&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=XTIN0AwPKAf2bIKNxlzdeqggAytE5h-JEusWpx9MXwc&m=jmno55vAHvkzpqOu9MyxTDBC_EvttMB5Fy4tSnRJJIEMkoeDvtUW6elNYmpIzUaX&s=DmtQYqlVGY-6Lv6p9rUHAITph1i14BuvIzgWHn2_PIU&e=
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20260831/c8767d8f/attachment.htm>